Macao vs Rwanda: Gross capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre

Macao
1.71 billion constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Rwanda
279.83 million constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Macao rank
5th
Rwanda rank
8th

Gross capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Macao
  • Rwanda
01.0B2.0B3.0B4.0B196119922023

How they compare

Macao currently reports 1.71 billion constant LCU per square kilometre against 279.83 million constant LCU per square kilometre in Rwanda, a difference of 1.43 billion constant LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Macao's figure about 6.1 times Rwanda's.

Across all 42 years both countries report, Macao has been ahead every year.

Macao ranks 5th and Rwanda ranks 8th of 166 countries.

Macao has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Macao Rwanda Difference Ahead
1980s 698.42 million constant LCU per square kilometre 18.89 million constant LCU per square kilometre 679.53 million constant LCU per square kilometre Macao
1990s 1.39 billion constant LCU per square kilometre 12.39 million constant LCU per square kilometre 1.37 billion constant LCU per square kilometre Macao
2000s 1.71 billion constant LCU per square kilometre 38.43 million constant LCU per square kilometre 1.68 billion constant LCU per square kilometre Macao
2010s 2.61 billion constant LCU per square kilometre 126.01 million constant LCU per square kilometre 2.48 billion constant LCU per square kilometre Macao
2020s 1.65 billion constant LCU per square kilometre 221.76 million constant LCU per square kilometre 1.43 billion constant LCU per square kilometre Macao

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre, Macao or Rwanda?
Macao, at 1.71 billion constant LCU per square kilometre against 279.83 million constant LCU per square kilometre in Rwanda as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre between Macao and Rwanda?
1.43 billion constant LCU per square kilometre, with Macao ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Macao and Rwanda?
42 years are reported by both, from 1982 to 2023.
How do Macao and Rwanda rank globally for gross capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre?
Macao ranks 5th and Rwanda ranks 8th of 166 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Macao vs Rwanda: Gross capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-capital-formation-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/macao-sar-china/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-capital-formation-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/macao-sar-china/rwanda/">Macao vs Rwanda: Gross capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
166 places, 6,614 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross capital formation (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.