Libya vs Zimbabwe: Gross capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre

Libya
5,775 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
17,504 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Libya rank
161st
Zimbabwe rank
158th

Gross capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Libya
  • Zimbabwe
5.0k10.0k15.0k20.0k200920162023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 17,504 constant LCU per square kilometre against 5,775 constant LCU per square kilometre in Libya, a difference of 11,729 constant LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 3.0 times Libya's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Libya ahead.

Libya ranks 161st and Zimbabwe ranks 158th of 166 countries.

Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Libya Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
2010s 7,857 constant LCU per square kilometre 9,425 constant LCU per square kilometre 1,568 constant LCU per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2020s 6,455 constant LCU per square kilometre 15,139 constant LCU per square kilometre 8,684 constant LCU per square kilometre Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre, Libya or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 17,504 constant LCU per square kilometre against 5,775 constant LCU per square kilometre in Libya as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre between Libya and Zimbabwe?
11,729 constant LCU per square kilometre, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Zimbabwe?
14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
How do Libya and Zimbabwe rank globally for gross capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre?
Libya ranks 161st and Zimbabwe ranks 158th of 166 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Libya vs Zimbabwe: Gross capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-capital-formation-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/libya/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-capital-formation-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/libya/zimbabwe/">Libya vs Zimbabwe: Gross capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
166 places, 6,614 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross capital formation (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.