Latvia vs Sierra Leone: Gross capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre

Latvia
122,265 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Sierra Leone
142,334 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Latvia rank
138th
Sierra Leone rank
135th

Gross capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Latvia
  • Sierra Leone
0100.0k200.0k300.0k199520092023

How they compare

Sierra Leone currently reports 142,334 constant LCU per square kilometre against 122,265 constant LCU per square kilometre in Latvia, a difference of 20,069 constant LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Sierra Leone's figure about 1.2 times Latvia's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Latvia ahead.

Latvia ranks 138th and Sierra Leone ranks 135th of 166 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 2 and Sierra Leone in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Latvia Sierra Leone Difference Ahead
2000s 99,357 constant LCU per square kilometre 43,517 constant LCU per square kilometre 55,840 constant LCU per square kilometre Latvia
2010s 90,611 constant LCU per square kilometre 157,594 constant LCU per square kilometre 66,983 constant LCU per square kilometre Sierra Leone
2020s 118,903 constant LCU per square kilometre 108,008 constant LCU per square kilometre 10,895 constant LCU per square kilometre Latvia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre, Latvia or Sierra Leone?
Sierra Leone, at 142,334 constant LCU per square kilometre against 122,265 constant LCU per square kilometre in Latvia as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre between Latvia and Sierra Leone?
20,069 constant LCU per square kilometre, with Sierra Leone ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Sierra Leone?
23 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2023.
How do Latvia and Sierra Leone rank globally for gross capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre?
Latvia ranks 138th and Sierra Leone ranks 135th of 166 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Latvia vs Sierra Leone: Gross capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-capital-formation-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/latvia/sierra-leone/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-capital-formation-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/latvia/sierra-leone/">Latvia vs Sierra Leone: Gross capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
166 places, 6,614 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross capital formation (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.