Kiribati vs Latvia: Gross capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre

Kiribati
119,058 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Latvia
122,265 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Kiribati rank
139th
Latvia rank
138th

Gross capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Kiribati
  • Latvia
050.0k100.0k150.0k199520092023

How they compare

Latvia currently reports 122,265 constant LCU per square kilometre against 119,058 constant LCU per square kilometre in Kiribati, a difference of 3,207 constant LCU per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Latvia ahead.

Kiribati ranks 139th and Latvia ranks 138th of 166 countries.

Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kiribati Latvia Difference Ahead
2000s 36,014 constant LCU per square kilometre 124,920 constant LCU per square kilometre 88,906 constant LCU per square kilometre Latvia
2010s 76,660 constant LCU per square kilometre 90,611 constant LCU per square kilometre 13,952 constant LCU per square kilometre Latvia
2020s 85,874 constant LCU per square kilometre 118,903 constant LCU per square kilometre 33,029 constant LCU per square kilometre Latvia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre, Kiribati or Latvia?
Latvia, at 122,265 constant LCU per square kilometre against 119,058 constant LCU per square kilometre in Kiribati as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre between Kiribati and Latvia?
3,207 constant LCU per square kilometre, with Latvia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Latvia?
18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
How do Kiribati and Latvia rank globally for gross capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre?
Kiribati ranks 139th and Latvia ranks 138th of 166 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kiribati vs Latvia: Gross capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-capital-formation-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/kiribati/latvia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-capital-formation-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/kiribati/latvia/">Kiribati vs Latvia: Gross capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
166 places, 6,614 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross capital formation (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.