Kenya vs Sweden: Gross capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre

Kenya
3.10 million constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Sweden
3.23 million constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Kenya rank
67th
Sweden rank
66th

Gross capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Kenya
  • Sweden
01.0M2.0M3.0M196119922023

How they compare

Sweden currently reports 3.23 million constant LCU per square kilometre against 3.10 million constant LCU per square kilometre in Kenya, a difference of 128,610 constant LCU per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Sweden ahead.

Kenya ranks 67th and Sweden ranks 66th of 166 countries.

Sweden has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kenya Sweden Difference Ahead
1970s 499,418 constant LCU per square kilometre 1.25 million constant LCU per square kilometre 753,764 constant LCU per square kilometre Sweden
1980s 476,258 constant LCU per square kilometre 1.35 million constant LCU per square kilometre 878,163 constant LCU per square kilometre Sweden
1990s 549,121 constant LCU per square kilometre 1.52 million constant LCU per square kilometre 970,664 constant LCU per square kilometre Sweden
2000s 1.06 million constant LCU per square kilometre 2.06 million constant LCU per square kilometre 1.00 million constant LCU per square kilometre Sweden
2010s 2.52 million constant LCU per square kilometre 2.68 million constant LCU per square kilometre 160,601 constant LCU per square kilometre Sweden
2020s 3.19 million constant LCU per square kilometre 3.23 million constant LCU per square kilometre 42,000 constant LCU per square kilometre Sweden

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre, Kenya or Sweden?
Sweden, at 3.23 million constant LCU per square kilometre against 3.10 million constant LCU per square kilometre in Kenya as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre between Kenya and Sweden?
128,610 constant LCU per square kilometre, with Sweden ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kenya and Sweden?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Kenya and Sweden rank globally for gross capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre?
Kenya ranks 67th and Sweden ranks 66th of 166 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kenya vs Sweden: Gross capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-capital-formation-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/kenya/sweden/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-capital-formation-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/kenya/sweden/">Kenya vs Sweden: Gross capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
166 places, 6,614 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross capital formation (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.