Indonesia vs Japan: Gross capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre

Indonesia
2.09 billion constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Japan
424.40 million constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Indonesia rank
4th
Japan rank
6th

Gross capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Indonesia
  • Japan
-5.0B-2.5B02.5B5.0B196119922023

How they compare

Indonesia currently reports 2.09 billion constant LCU per square kilometre against 424.40 million constant LCU per square kilometre in Japan, a difference of 1.66 billion constant LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Indonesia's figure about 4.9 times Japan's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Japan ahead.

Indonesia ranks 4th and Japan ranks 6th of 166 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Indonesia averaged higher in 4 and Japan in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Indonesia Japan Difference Ahead
1970s 139.96 million constant LCU per square kilometre 218.94 million constant LCU per square kilometre 78.98 million constant LCU per square kilometre Japan
1980s 2.78 billion constant LCU per square kilometre 303.11 million constant LCU per square kilometre 2.48 billion constant LCU per square kilometre Indonesia
1990s 2.29 billion constant LCU per square kilometre 442.15 million constant LCU per square kilometre 1.84 billion constant LCU per square kilometre Indonesia
2000s -1.75 billion constant LCU per square kilometre 405.79 million constant LCU per square kilometre 2.15 billion constant LCU per square kilometre Japan
2010s 1.60 billion constant LCU per square kilometre 393.63 million constant LCU per square kilometre 1.21 billion constant LCU per square kilometre Indonesia
2020s 1.96 billion constant LCU per square kilometre 419.38 million constant LCU per square kilometre 1.54 billion constant LCU per square kilometre Indonesia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre, Indonesia or Japan?
Indonesia, at 2.09 billion constant LCU per square kilometre against 424.40 million constant LCU per square kilometre in Japan as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre between Indonesia and Japan?
1.66 billion constant LCU per square kilometre, with Indonesia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Indonesia and Japan?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Indonesia and Japan rank globally for gross capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre?
Indonesia ranks 4th and Japan ranks 6th of 166 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Indonesia vs Japan: Gross capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-capital-formation-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/indonesia/japan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-capital-formation-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/indonesia/japan/">Indonesia vs Japan: Gross capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
166 places, 6,614 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross capital formation (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.