Iceland vs Malawi: Gross capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre

Iceland
8.75 million constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Malawi
9.27 million constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Iceland rank
49th
Malawi rank
48th

Gross capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Iceland
  • Malawi
05.0M10.0M15.0M197019962023

How they compare

Malawi currently reports 9.27 million constant LCU per square kilometre against 8.75 million constant LCU per square kilometre in Iceland, a difference of 512,230 constant LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Malawi's figure about 1.1 times Iceland's.

Across all 7 years both countries report, Malawi has been ahead every year.

Iceland ranks 49th and Malawi ranks 48th of 166 countries.

Malawi has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Iceland Malawi Difference Ahead
2010s 6.89 million constant LCU per square kilometre 14.37 million constant LCU per square kilometre 7.48 million constant LCU per square kilometre Malawi
2020s 7.59 million constant LCU per square kilometre 11.45 million constant LCU per square kilometre 3.85 million constant LCU per square kilometre Malawi

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre, Iceland or Malawi?
Malawi, at 9.27 million constant LCU per square kilometre against 8.75 million constant LCU per square kilometre in Iceland as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre between Iceland and Malawi?
512,230 constant LCU per square kilometre, with Malawi ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Malawi?
7 years are reported by both, from 2017 to 2023.
How do Iceland and Malawi rank globally for gross capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre?
Iceland ranks 49th and Malawi ranks 48th of 166 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Iceland vs Malawi: Gross capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-capital-formation-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/iceland/malawi/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-capital-formation-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/iceland/malawi/">Iceland vs Malawi: Gross capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
166 places, 6,614 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross capital formation (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.