Honduras vs Nicaragua: Gross capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre

Honduras
415,108 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Nicaragua
412,013 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Honduras rank
112th
Nicaragua rank
113th

Gross capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Honduras
  • Nicaragua
0200.0k400.0k196119922023

How they compare

Honduras currently reports 415,108 constant LCU per square kilometre against 412,013 constant LCU per square kilometre in Nicaragua, a difference of 3,095 constant LCU per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Nicaragua ahead.

Honduras ranks 112th and Nicaragua ranks 113th of 166 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Honduras averaged higher in 2 and Nicaragua in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Honduras Nicaragua Difference Ahead
1960s 11,349 constant LCU per square kilometre 124,460 constant LCU per square kilometre 113,110 constant LCU per square kilometre Nicaragua
1970s 15,109 constant LCU per square kilometre 178,632 constant LCU per square kilometre 163,523 constant LCU per square kilometre Nicaragua
1980s 33,847 constant LCU per square kilometre 204,160 constant LCU per square kilometre 170,313 constant LCU per square kilometre Nicaragua
1990s 140,112 constant LCU per square kilometre 181,702 constant LCU per square kilometre 41,589 constant LCU per square kilometre Nicaragua
2000s 312,578 constant LCU per square kilometre 272,085 constant LCU per square kilometre 40,493 constant LCU per square kilometre Honduras
2010s 372,297 constant LCU per square kilometre 390,278 constant LCU per square kilometre 17,981 constant LCU per square kilometre Nicaragua
2020s 426,224 constant LCU per square kilometre 364,152 constant LCU per square kilometre 62,072 constant LCU per square kilometre Honduras

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre, Honduras or Nicaragua?
Honduras, at 415,108 constant LCU per square kilometre against 412,013 constant LCU per square kilometre in Nicaragua as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre between Honduras and Nicaragua?
3,095 constant LCU per square kilometre, with Honduras ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Honduras and Nicaragua?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Honduras and Nicaragua rank globally for gross capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre?
Honduras ranks 112th and Nicaragua ranks 113th of 166 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Honduras vs Nicaragua: Gross capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-capital-formation-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/honduras/nicaragua/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-capital-formation-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/honduras/nicaragua/">Honduras vs Nicaragua: Gross capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
166 places, 6,614 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross capital formation (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.