Guatemala vs Morocco: Gross capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre

Guatemala
909,306 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Morocco
842,050 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Guatemala rank
96th
Morocco rank
97th

Gross capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Guatemala
  • Morocco
0200.0k400.0k600.0k800.0k1.0M196119922023

How they compare

Guatemala currently reports 909,306 constant LCU per square kilometre against 842,050 constant LCU per square kilometre in Morocco, a difference of 67,256 constant LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Guatemala's figure about 1.1 times Morocco's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 58 shared years of data; in 1966 it was Guatemala ahead.

Guatemala ranks 96th and Morocco ranks 97th of 166 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Guatemala averaged higher in 5 and Morocco in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guatemala Morocco Difference Ahead
1960s 161,807 constant LCU per square kilometre 45,457 constant LCU per square kilometre 116,350 constant LCU per square kilometre Guatemala
1970s 269,688 constant LCU per square kilometre 118,334 constant LCU per square kilometre 151,354 constant LCU per square kilometre Guatemala
1980s 257,658 constant LCU per square kilometre 155,374 constant LCU per square kilometre 102,284 constant LCU per square kilometre Guatemala
1990s 389,472 constant LCU per square kilometre 228,414 constant LCU per square kilometre 161,057 constant LCU per square kilometre Guatemala
2000s 600,830 constant LCU per square kilometre 444,134 constant LCU per square kilometre 156,696 constant LCU per square kilometre Guatemala
2010s 615,800 constant LCU per square kilometre 740,102 constant LCU per square kilometre 124,302 constant LCU per square kilometre Morocco
2020s 807,944 constant LCU per square kilometre 815,272 constant LCU per square kilometre 7,328 constant LCU per square kilometre Morocco

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre, Guatemala or Morocco?
Guatemala, at 909,306 constant LCU per square kilometre against 842,050 constant LCU per square kilometre in Morocco as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre between Guatemala and Morocco?
67,256 constant LCU per square kilometre, with Guatemala ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Morocco?
58 years are reported by both, from 1966 to 2023.
How do Guatemala and Morocco rank globally for gross capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre?
Guatemala ranks 96th and Morocco ranks 97th of 166 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guatemala vs Morocco: Gross capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-capital-formation-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/guatemala/morocco/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-capital-formation-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/guatemala/morocco/">Guatemala vs Morocco: Gross capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
166 places, 6,614 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross capital formation (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.