Guatemala vs Malaysia: Gross capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre

Guatemala
909,306 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Malaysia
1.05 million constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Guatemala rank
96th
Malaysia rank
95th

Gross capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Guatemala
  • Malaysia
0250.0k500.0k750.0k1.0M196119922023

How they compare

Malaysia currently reports 1.05 million constant LCU per square kilometre against 909,306 constant LCU per square kilometre in Guatemala, a difference of 143,384 constant LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Malaysia's figure about 1.2 times Guatemala's.

The two have swapped places 11 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Guatemala ahead.

Guatemala ranks 96th and Malaysia ranks 95th of 166 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Guatemala averaged higher in 4 and Malaysia in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guatemala Malaysia Difference Ahead
1960s 136,101 constant LCU per square kilometre 41,751 constant LCU per square kilometre 94,350 constant LCU per square kilometre Guatemala
1970s 269,688 constant LCU per square kilometre 91,480 constant LCU per square kilometre 178,208 constant LCU per square kilometre Guatemala
1980s 257,658 constant LCU per square kilometre 192,137 constant LCU per square kilometre 65,521 constant LCU per square kilometre Guatemala
1990s 389,472 constant LCU per square kilometre 469,866 constant LCU per square kilometre 80,394 constant LCU per square kilometre Malaysia
2000s 600,830 constant LCU per square kilometre 529,885 constant LCU per square kilometre 70,944 constant LCU per square kilometre Guatemala
2010s 615,800 constant LCU per square kilometre 871,307 constant LCU per square kilometre 255,506 constant LCU per square kilometre Malaysia
2020s 807,944 constant LCU per square kilometre 947,657 constant LCU per square kilometre 139,713 constant LCU per square kilometre Malaysia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre, Guatemala or Malaysia?
Malaysia, at 1.05 million constant LCU per square kilometre against 909,306 constant LCU per square kilometre in Guatemala as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre between Guatemala and Malaysia?
143,384 constant LCU per square kilometre, with Malaysia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Malaysia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Guatemala and Malaysia rank globally for gross capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre?
Guatemala ranks 96th and Malaysia ranks 95th of 166 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guatemala vs Malaysia: Gross capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-capital-formation-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/guatemala/malaysia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-capital-formation-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/guatemala/malaysia/">Guatemala vs Malaysia: Gross capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
166 places, 6,614 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross capital formation (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.