France vs Guatemala: Gross capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre

France
1.06 million constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Guatemala
909,306 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
France rank
94th
Guatemala rank
96th

Gross capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • France
  • Guatemala
0200.0k400.0k600.0k800.0k1.0M196119922023

How they compare

France currently reports 1.06 million constant LCU per square kilometre against 909,306 constant LCU per square kilometre in Guatemala, a difference of 148,014 constant LCU per square kilometre.

That makes France's figure about 1.2 times Guatemala's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, France has been ahead every year.

France ranks 94th and Guatemala ranks 96th of 166 countries.

France has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade France Guatemala Difference Ahead
1960s 312,559 constant LCU per square kilometre 136,101 constant LCU per square kilometre 176,458 constant LCU per square kilometre France
1970s 484,758 constant LCU per square kilometre 269,688 constant LCU per square kilometre 215,070 constant LCU per square kilometre France
1980s 533,027 constant LCU per square kilometre 257,658 constant LCU per square kilometre 275,369 constant LCU per square kilometre France
1990s 645,960 constant LCU per square kilometre 389,472 constant LCU per square kilometre 256,488 constant LCU per square kilometre France
2000s 859,400 constant LCU per square kilometre 600,830 constant LCU per square kilometre 258,571 constant LCU per square kilometre France
2010s 944,883 constant LCU per square kilometre 615,800 constant LCU per square kilometre 329,083 constant LCU per square kilometre France
2020s 1.04 million constant LCU per square kilometre 807,944 constant LCU per square kilometre 232,100 constant LCU per square kilometre France

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre, France or Guatemala?
France, at 1.06 million constant LCU per square kilometre against 909,306 constant LCU per square kilometre in Guatemala as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre between France and Guatemala?
148,014 constant LCU per square kilometre, with France ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for France and Guatemala?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do France and Guatemala rank globally for gross capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre?
France ranks 94th and Guatemala ranks 96th of 166 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

France vs Guatemala: Gross capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-capital-formation-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/france/guatemala/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-capital-formation-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/france/guatemala/">France vs Guatemala: Gross capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
166 places, 6,614 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross capital formation (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.