Chile vs Tanzania: Gross capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre

Chile
63.70 million constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Tanzania
64.22 million constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Chile rank
21st
Tanzania rank
20th

Gross capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Chile
  • Tanzania
020.0M40.0M60.0M196119922023

How they compare

Tanzania currently reports 64.22 million constant LCU per square kilometre against 63.70 million constant LCU per square kilometre in Chile, a difference of 512,000 constant LCU per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Chile ahead.

Chile ranks 21st and Tanzania ranks 20th of 166 countries.

Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Tanzania Difference Ahead
1990s 16.11 million constant LCU per square kilometre 5.59 million constant LCU per square kilometre 10.52 million constant LCU per square kilometre Chile
2000s 33.06 million constant LCU per square kilometre 12.04 million constant LCU per square kilometre 21.02 million constant LCU per square kilometre Chile
2010s 58.99 million constant LCU per square kilometre 34.93 million constant LCU per square kilometre 24.06 million constant LCU per square kilometre Chile
2020s 61.95 million constant LCU per square kilometre 57.59 million constant LCU per square kilometre 4.35 million constant LCU per square kilometre Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre, Chile or Tanzania?
Tanzania, at 64.22 million constant LCU per square kilometre against 63.70 million constant LCU per square kilometre in Chile as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre between Chile and Tanzania?
512,000 constant LCU per square kilometre, with Tanzania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Tanzania?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Chile and Tanzania rank globally for gross capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre?
Chile ranks 21st and Tanzania ranks 20th of 166 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Tanzania: Gross capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-capital-formation-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/chile/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-capital-formation-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/chile/tanzania/">Chile vs Tanzania: Gross capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
166 places, 6,614 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross capital formation (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.