Burkina Faso vs Iceland: Gross capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre

Burkina Faso
8.58 million constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Iceland
8.75 million constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Burkina Faso rank
50th
Iceland rank
49th

Gross capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Burkina Faso
  • Iceland
02.0M4.0M6.0M8.0M10.0M196519942023

How they compare

Iceland currently reports 8.75 million constant LCU per square kilometre against 8.58 million constant LCU per square kilometre in Burkina Faso, a difference of 174,630 constant LCU per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Iceland ahead.

Burkina Faso ranks 50th and Iceland ranks 49th of 166 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Burkina Faso averaged higher in 2 and Iceland in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Burkina Faso Iceland Difference Ahead
1970s 566,550 constant LCU per square kilometre 2.34 million constant LCU per square kilometre 1.77 million constant LCU per square kilometre Iceland
1980s 848,488 constant LCU per square kilometre 2.79 million constant LCU per square kilometre 1.95 million constant LCU per square kilometre Iceland
1990s 1.40 million constant LCU per square kilometre 3.17 million constant LCU per square kilometre 1.77 million constant LCU per square kilometre Iceland
2000s 2.04 million constant LCU per square kilometre 5.84 million constant LCU per square kilometre 3.80 million constant LCU per square kilometre Iceland
2010s 5.42 million constant LCU per square kilometre 5.07 million constant LCU per square kilometre 357,579 constant LCU per square kilometre Burkina Faso
2020s 8.01 million constant LCU per square kilometre 7.59 million constant LCU per square kilometre 413,860 constant LCU per square kilometre Burkina Faso

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre, Burkina Faso or Iceland?
Iceland, at 8.75 million constant LCU per square kilometre against 8.58 million constant LCU per square kilometre in Burkina Faso as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre between Burkina Faso and Iceland?
174,630 constant LCU per square kilometre, with Iceland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Iceland?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Burkina Faso and Iceland rank globally for gross capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre?
Burkina Faso ranks 50th and Iceland ranks 49th of 166 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Burkina Faso vs Iceland: Gross capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-capital-formation-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/burkina-faso/iceland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-capital-formation-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/burkina-faso/iceland/">Burkina Faso vs Iceland: Gross capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
166 places, 6,614 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross capital formation (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.