Botswana vs Latvia: Gross capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre

Botswana
99,977 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Latvia
122,265 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Botswana rank
141st
Latvia rank
138th

Gross capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Botswana
  • Latvia
050.0k100.0k150.0k197519992023

How they compare

Latvia currently reports 122,265 constant LCU per square kilometre against 99,977 constant LCU per square kilometre in Botswana, a difference of 22,288 constant LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Latvia's figure about 1.2 times Botswana's.

Across all 29 years both countries report, Latvia has been ahead every year.

Botswana ranks 141st and Latvia ranks 138th of 166 countries.

Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana Latvia Difference Ahead
1990s 8,460 constant LCU per square kilometre 33,338 constant LCU per square kilometre 24,878 constant LCU per square kilometre Latvia
2000s 22,509 constant LCU per square kilometre 94,080 constant LCU per square kilometre 71,571 constant LCU per square kilometre Latvia
2010s 70,068 constant LCU per square kilometre 90,611 constant LCU per square kilometre 20,543 constant LCU per square kilometre Latvia
2020s 92,685 constant LCU per square kilometre 118,903 constant LCU per square kilometre 26,219 constant LCU per square kilometre Latvia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre, Botswana or Latvia?
Latvia, at 122,265 constant LCU per square kilometre against 99,977 constant LCU per square kilometre in Botswana as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre between Botswana and Latvia?
22,288 constant LCU per square kilometre, with Latvia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Latvia?
29 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2023.
How do Botswana and Latvia rank globally for gross capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre?
Botswana ranks 141st and Latvia ranks 138th of 166 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Botswana vs Latvia: Gross capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-capital-formation-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/botswana/latvia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-capital-formation-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/botswana/latvia/">Botswana vs Latvia: Gross capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
166 places, 6,614 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross capital formation (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.