Botswana vs Kiribati: Gross capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre

Botswana
99,977 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Kiribati
119,058 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Botswana rank
141st
Kiribati rank
139th

Gross capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Botswana
  • Kiribati
025.0k50.0k75.0k100.0k125.0k197519992023

How they compare

Kiribati currently reports 119,058 constant LCU per square kilometre against 99,977 constant LCU per square kilometre in Botswana, a difference of 19,081 constant LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Kiribati's figure about 1.2 times Botswana's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Kiribati ahead.

Botswana ranks 141st and Kiribati ranks 139th of 166 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 2 and Kiribati in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana Kiribati Difference Ahead
2000s 36,603 constant LCU per square kilometre 36,014 constant LCU per square kilometre 589.05 constant LCU per square kilometre Botswana
2010s 70,068 constant LCU per square kilometre 76,660 constant LCU per square kilometre 6,591 constant LCU per square kilometre Kiribati
2020s 92,685 constant LCU per square kilometre 85,874 constant LCU per square kilometre 6,810 constant LCU per square kilometre Botswana

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre, Botswana or Kiribati?
Kiribati, at 119,058 constant LCU per square kilometre against 99,977 constant LCU per square kilometre in Botswana as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre between Botswana and Kiribati?
19,081 constant LCU per square kilometre, with Kiribati ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Kiribati?
18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
How do Botswana and Kiribati rank globally for gross capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre?
Botswana ranks 141st and Kiribati ranks 139th of 166 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Botswana vs Kiribati: Gross capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-capital-formation-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/botswana/kiribati/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-capital-formation-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/botswana/kiribati/">Botswana vs Kiribati: Gross capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
166 places, 6,614 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross capital formation (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.