Belarus vs Croatia: Gross capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre

Belarus
238,542 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Croatia
246,939 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Belarus rank
125th
Croatia rank
123rd

Gross capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Belarus
  • Croatia
100.0k200.0k300.0k199220072023

How they compare

Croatia currently reports 246,939 constant LCU per square kilometre against 238,542 constant LCU per square kilometre in Belarus, a difference of 8,397 constant LCU per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 29 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Croatia ahead.

Belarus ranks 125th and Croatia ranks 123rd of 166 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 1 and Croatia in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Croatia Difference Ahead
1990s 63,601 constant LCU per square kilometre 115,215 constant LCU per square kilometre 51,613 constant LCU per square kilometre Croatia
2000s 148,240 constant LCU per square kilometre 195,814 constant LCU per square kilometre 47,574 constant LCU per square kilometre Croatia
2010s 288,346 constant LCU per square kilometre 187,228 constant LCU per square kilometre 101,118 constant LCU per square kilometre Belarus
2020s 237,553 constant LCU per square kilometre 239,860 constant LCU per square kilometre 2,307 constant LCU per square kilometre Croatia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre, Belarus or Croatia?
Croatia, at 246,939 constant LCU per square kilometre against 238,542 constant LCU per square kilometre in Belarus as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre between Belarus and Croatia?
8,397 constant LCU per square kilometre, with Croatia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Croatia?
29 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2023.
How do Belarus and Croatia rank globally for gross capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre?
Belarus ranks 125th and Croatia ranks 123rd of 166 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Croatia: Gross capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-capital-formation-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/belarus/croatia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-capital-formation-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/belarus/croatia/">Belarus vs Croatia: Gross capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
166 places, 6,614 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross capital formation (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.