Belarus vs Bosnia and Herzegovina: Gross capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre

Belarus
238,542 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Bosnia and Herzegovina
214,383 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Belarus rank
125th
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
128th

Gross capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Belarus
  • Bosnia and Herzegovina
100.0k200.0k300.0k199220072023

How they compare

Belarus currently reports 238,542 constant LCU per square kilometre against 214,383 constant LCU per square kilometre in Bosnia and Herzegovina, a difference of 24,159 constant LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Belarus's figure about 1.1 times Bosnia and Herzegovina's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.

Belarus ranks 125th and Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 128th of 166 countries.

Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Bosnia and Herzegovina Difference Ahead
2000s 148,240 constant LCU per square kilometre 108,084 constant LCU per square kilometre 40,156 constant LCU per square kilometre Belarus
2010s 288,346 constant LCU per square kilometre 138,212 constant LCU per square kilometre 150,134 constant LCU per square kilometre Belarus
2020s 237,553 constant LCU per square kilometre 197,052 constant LCU per square kilometre 40,501 constant LCU per square kilometre Belarus

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre, Belarus or Bosnia and Herzegovina?
Belarus, at 238,542 constant LCU per square kilometre against 214,383 constant LCU per square kilometre in Bosnia and Herzegovina as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre between Belarus and Bosnia and Herzegovina?
24,159 constant LCU per square kilometre, with Belarus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Bosnia and Herzegovina?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Belarus and Bosnia and Herzegovina rank globally for gross capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre?
Belarus ranks 125th and Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 128th of 166 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Bosnia and Herzegovina: Gross capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-capital-formation-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/belarus/bosnia-and-herzegovina/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-capital-formation-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/belarus/bosnia-and-herzegovina/">Belarus vs Bosnia and Herzegovina: Gross capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
166 places, 6,614 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross capital formation (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.