Congo vs Serbia: Gross capital formation
Congo
4.9%
in 2025
Serbia
4.8%
in 2025
Congo rank
79th
Serbia rank
81st
Gross capital formation over time
- Congo
- Serbia
How they compare
Congo currently reports 4.9% against 4.8% in Serbia, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 11 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Serbia ahead.
Congo ranks 79th and Serbia ranks 81st of 168 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 1 and Serbia in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -4.5% | -7.4% | 2.9% | Congo |
| 2000s | 12.0% | 17.4% | 5.3% | Serbia |
| 2010s | 1.8% | 6.0% | 4.2% | Serbia |
| 2020s | 3.5% | 4.9% | 1.4% | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross capital formation, Congo or Serbia?
- Congo, at 4.9% against 4.8% in Serbia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gross capital formation between Congo and Serbia?
- 0.1%, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Serbia?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2025.
- How do Congo and Serbia rank globally for gross capital formation?
- Congo ranks 79th and Serbia ranks 81st of 168 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Gross capital formation (annual % growth). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross capital formation includes acquisitions less disposals of produced assets for purposes of fixed capital formation, inventories or valuables. This indicator denotes the percentage change over each previous year of the constant price (base year 2015) series in United States dollars.