North Macedonia vs Uzbekistan: Grants, excluding technical cooperation

North Macedonia
187.93 million BoP, current US$
in 2023
Uzbekistan
190.05 million BoP, current US$
in 2023
North Macedonia rank
89th
Uzbekistan rank
88th

Grants, excluding technical cooperation over time

  • North Macedonia
  • Uzbekistan
050.0M100.0M150.0M200.0M199220072023

How they compare

Uzbekistan currently reports 190.05 million BoP, current US$ against 187.93 million BoP, current US$ in North Macedonia, a difference of 2.12 million BoP, current US$.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Uzbekistan ahead.

North Macedonia ranks 89th and Uzbekistan ranks 88th of 180 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, North Macedonia averaged higher in 3 and Uzbekistan in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade North Macedonia Uzbekistan Difference Ahead
1990s 52.20 million BoP, current US$ 20.50 million BoP, current US$ 31.70 million BoP, current US$ North Macedonia
2000s 141.43 million BoP, current US$ 54.83 million BoP, current US$ 86.60 million BoP, current US$ North Macedonia
2010s 126.64 million BoP, current US$ 96.72 million BoP, current US$ 29.92 million BoP, current US$ North Macedonia
2020s 158.66 million BoP, current US$ 178.32 million BoP, current US$ 19.66 million BoP, current US$ Uzbekistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher grants, excluding technical cooperation, North Macedonia or Uzbekistan?
Uzbekistan, at 190.05 million BoP, current US$ against 187.93 million BoP, current US$ in North Macedonia as of 2023.
What is the difference in grants, excluding technical cooperation between North Macedonia and Uzbekistan?
2.12 million BoP, current US$, with Uzbekistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for North Macedonia and Uzbekistan?
31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
How do North Macedonia and Uzbekistan rank globally for grants, excluding technical cooperation?
North Macedonia ranks 89th and Uzbekistan ranks 88th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
DAC2A: Aid (ODA) disbursements to countries and regions, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), published as Grants, excluding technical cooperation (BoP, current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

North Macedonia vs Uzbekistan: Grants, excluding technical cooperation. Statizoid, drawing on DAC2A: Aid (ODA) disbursements to countries and regions, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Retrieved 26 August 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/grants-excluding-technical-cooperation-bop-current-us/north-macedonia/uzbekistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/grants-excluding-technical-cooperation-bop-current-us/north-macedonia/uzbekistan/">North Macedonia vs Uzbekistan: Grants, excluding technical cooperation</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Grants, excluding technical cooperation (BoP, current US$)
Unit
BoP, current US$
Source
DAC2A: Aid (ODA) disbursements to countries and regions, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
181 places, 9,080 data points, 1960–2023
Last refreshed

Grants are transfers made in cash, goods or services for which no repayment is required. For ODA reporting purposes, they also include forgiveness of non-military debt, support to non-governmental organisations, certain interest subsidies, and certain costs incurred in the implementation of aid. Grants to multilateral agencies intended to soften the terms of the latter’s lending are a direct resource outflow and should also be recorded as ODA grants. For OOF reporting purposes, grants for commercial purposes such as subsidies to national private investors, and grants to forgive military debt, are also included. Grant-like flows are assimilated to grants. They comprise a) loans for which the service payments are to be made into an account in the borrowing country and used in the borrowing country for its own benefit, and b) provision of commodities for sale in the recipient’s currency the proceeds of which are used in the recipient country for its own benefit. Data are in current U.S. dollars.