Namibia vs Vanuatu: Grants, excluding technical cooperation (BoP, current US$)

Namibia
152.18 million BoP, current US$
in 2024
Vanuatu
154.06 million BoP, current US$
in 2024
Namibia rank
103rd
Vanuatu rank
102nd

Grants, excluding technical cooperation (BoP, current US$) over time

  • Namibia
  • Vanuatu
0100.0M200.0M300.0M196019922024

How they compare

Vanuatu currently reports 154.06 million BoP, current US$ against 152.18 million BoP, current US$ in Namibia, a difference of 1.88 million BoP, current US$.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 42 shared years of data; in 1972 it was Vanuatu ahead.

Namibia ranks 103rd and Vanuatu ranks 102nd of 181 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Namibia averaged higher in 4 and Vanuatu in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Namibia Vanuatu Difference Ahead
1970s 0 BoP, current US$ 3.86 million BoP, current US$ 3.86 million BoP, current US$ Vanuatu
1980s 8.11 million BoP, current US$ 15.43 million BoP, current US$ 7.33 million BoP, current US$ Vanuatu
1990s 86.71 million BoP, current US$ 12.95 million BoP, current US$ 73.77 million BoP, current US$ Namibia
2000s 101.57 million BoP, current US$ 23.48 million BoP, current US$ 78.09 million BoP, current US$ Namibia
2010s 173.66 million BoP, current US$ 68.10 million BoP, current US$ 105.56 million BoP, current US$ Namibia
2020s 150.16 million BoP, current US$ 128.89 million BoP, current US$ 21.28 million BoP, current US$ Namibia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher grants, excluding technical cooperation, Namibia or Vanuatu?
Vanuatu, at 154.06 million BoP, current US$ against 152.18 million BoP, current US$ in Namibia as of 2024.
What is the difference in grants, excluding technical cooperation between Namibia and Vanuatu?
1.88 million BoP, current US$, with Vanuatu ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and Vanuatu?
42 years are reported by both, from 1972 to 2024.
How do Namibia and Vanuatu rank globally for grants, excluding technical cooperation?
Namibia ranks 103rd and Vanuatu ranks 102nd of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
DAC2A: Aid (ODA) disbursements to countries and regions, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), published as Grants, excluding technical cooperation (BoP, current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Namibia vs Vanuatu: Grants, excluding technical cooperation. Statizoid, drawing on DAC2A: Aid (ODA) disbursements to countries and regions, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Retrieved 15 November 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/grants-excluding-technical-cooperation-bop-current-us/namibia/vanuatu/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/grants-excluding-technical-cooperation-bop-current-us/namibia/vanuatu/">Namibia vs Vanuatu: Grants, excluding technical cooperation</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Grants, excluding technical cooperation (BoP, current US$)
Unit
BoP, current US$
Source
DAC2A: Aid (ODA) disbursements to countries and regions, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
182 places, 9,232 data points, 1960–2024
Last refreshed

Grants are transfers made in cash, goods or services for which no repayment is required. For ODA reporting purposes, they also include forgiveness of non-military debt, support to non-governmental organisations, certain interest subsidies, and certain costs incurred in the implementation of aid. Grants to multilateral agencies intended to soften the terms of the latter’s lending are a direct resource outflow and should also be recorded as ODA grants. For OOF reporting purposes, grants for commercial purposes such as subsidies to national private investors, and grants to forgive military debt, are also included. Grant-like flows are assimilated to grants. They comprise a) loans for which the service payments are to be made into an account in the borrowing country and used in the borrowing country for its own benefit, and b) provision of commodities for sale in the recipient’s currency the proceeds of which are used in the recipient country for its own benefit. Data are in current U.S. dollars.