Malta vs Uruguay: Grants, excluding technical cooperation (BoP, current US$)

Malta
11.70 million BoP, current US$
in 2002
Uruguay
9.26 million BoP, current US$
in 2017
Malta rank
157th
Uruguay rank
159th

Grants, excluding technical cooperation (BoP, current US$) over time

  • Malta
  • Uruguay
020.0M40.0M60.0M196019882017

How they compare

Malta currently reports 11.70 million BoP, current US$ against 9.26 million BoP, current US$ in Uruguay, a difference of 2.44 million BoP, current US$.

That makes Malta's figure about 1.3 times Uruguay's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 43 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Uruguay ahead.

Malta ranks 157th and Uruguay ranks 159th of 181 countries.

Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malta Uruguay Difference Ahead
1960s 10.84 million BoP, current US$ 3.24 million BoP, current US$ 7.60 million BoP, current US$ Malta
1970s 23.55 million BoP, current US$ 1.33 million BoP, current US$ 22.22 million BoP, current US$ Malta
1980s 8.70 million BoP, current US$ 4.56 million BoP, current US$ 4.14 million BoP, current US$ Malta
1990s 22.37 million BoP, current US$ 10.67 million BoP, current US$ 11.70 million BoP, current US$ Malta
2000s 12.68 million BoP, current US$ 8.94 million BoP, current US$ 3.74 million BoP, current US$ Malta

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher grants, excluding technical cooperation, Malta or Uruguay?
Malta, at 11.70 million BoP, current US$ against 9.26 million BoP, current US$ in Uruguay as of 2002.
What is the difference in grants, excluding technical cooperation between Malta and Uruguay?
2.44 million BoP, current US$, with Malta ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Uruguay?
43 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2002.
How do Malta and Uruguay rank globally for grants, excluding technical cooperation?
Malta ranks 157th and Uruguay ranks 159th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
DAC2A: Aid (ODA) disbursements to countries and regions, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), published as Grants, excluding technical cooperation (BoP, current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malta vs Uruguay: Grants, excluding technical cooperation. Statizoid, drawing on DAC2A: Aid (ODA) disbursements to countries and regions, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Retrieved 15 November 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/grants-excluding-technical-cooperation-bop-current-us/malta/uruguay/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/grants-excluding-technical-cooperation-bop-current-us/malta/uruguay/">Malta vs Uruguay: Grants, excluding technical cooperation</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Grants, excluding technical cooperation (BoP, current US$)
Unit
BoP, current US$
Source
DAC2A: Aid (ODA) disbursements to countries and regions, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
182 places, 9,232 data points, 1960–2024
Last refreshed

Grants are transfers made in cash, goods or services for which no repayment is required. For ODA reporting purposes, they also include forgiveness of non-military debt, support to non-governmental organisations, certain interest subsidies, and certain costs incurred in the implementation of aid. Grants to multilateral agencies intended to soften the terms of the latter’s lending are a direct resource outflow and should also be recorded as ODA grants. For OOF reporting purposes, grants for commercial purposes such as subsidies to national private investors, and grants to forgive military debt, are also included. Grant-like flows are assimilated to grants. They comprise a) loans for which the service payments are to be made into an account in the borrowing country and used in the borrowing country for its own benefit, and b) provision of commodities for sale in the recipient’s currency the proceeds of which are used in the recipient country for its own benefit. Data are in current U.S. dollars.