Macau, China vs United Arab Emirates: Grants, excluding technical cooperation

Macau, China
0 BoP, current US$
in 1999
United Arab Emirates
170,000 BoP, current US$
in 1995
Macau, China rank
176th
United Arab Emirates rank
173rd

Grants, excluding technical cooperation over time

  • Macau, China
  • United Arab Emirates
010.0M20.0M30.0M196019791999

How they compare

United Arab Emirates currently reports 170,000 BoP, current US$ against 0 BoP, current US$ in Macau, China, a difference of 170,000 BoP, current US$.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Macau, China ahead.

Macau, China ranks 176th and United Arab Emirates ranks 173rd of 180 countries.

United Arab Emirates has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Macau, China United Arab Emirates Difference Ahead
1960s 352,500 BoP, current US$ 807,500 BoP, current US$ 455,000 BoP, current US$ United Arab Emirates
1970s 0 BoP, current US$ 2.45 million BoP, current US$ 2.45 million BoP, current US$ United Arab Emirates
1980s 6,000 BoP, current US$ 267,000 BoP, current US$ 261,000 BoP, current US$ United Arab Emirates
1990s 6,667 BoP, current US$ 695,000 BoP, current US$ 688,333 BoP, current US$ United Arab Emirates

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher grants, excluding technical cooperation, Macau, China or United Arab Emirates?
United Arab Emirates, at 170,000 BoP, current US$ against 0 BoP, current US$ in Macau, China as of 1995.
What is the difference in grants, excluding technical cooperation between Macau, China and United Arab Emirates?
170,000 BoP, current US$, with United Arab Emirates ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Macau, China and United Arab Emirates?
31 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 1995.
How do Macau, China and United Arab Emirates rank globally for grants, excluding technical cooperation?
Macau, China ranks 176th and United Arab Emirates ranks 173rd of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
DAC2A: Aid (ODA) disbursements to countries and regions, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), published as Grants, excluding technical cooperation (BoP, current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Macau, China vs United Arab Emirates: Grants, excluding technical cooperation. Statizoid, drawing on DAC2A: Aid (ODA) disbursements to countries and regions, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Retrieved 24 August 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/grants-excluding-technical-cooperation-bop-current-us/macao-sar-china/united-arab-emirates/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/grants-excluding-technical-cooperation-bop-current-us/macao-sar-china/united-arab-emirates/">Macau, China vs United Arab Emirates: Grants, excluding technical cooperation</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Grants, excluding technical cooperation (BoP, current US$)
Unit
BoP, current US$
Source
DAC2A: Aid (ODA) disbursements to countries and regions, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
181 places, 9,080 data points, 1960–2023
Last refreshed

Grants are transfers made in cash, goods or services for which no repayment is required. For ODA reporting purposes, they also include forgiveness of non-military debt, support to non-governmental organisations, certain interest subsidies, and certain costs incurred in the implementation of aid. Grants to multilateral agencies intended to soften the terms of the latter’s lending are a direct resource outflow and should also be recorded as ODA grants. For OOF reporting purposes, grants for commercial purposes such as subsidies to national private investors, and grants to forgive military debt, are also included. Grant-like flows are assimilated to grants. They comprise a) loans for which the service payments are to be made into an account in the borrowing country and used in the borrowing country for its own benefit, and b) provision of commodities for sale in the recipient’s currency the proceeds of which are used in the recipient country for its own benefit. Data are in current U.S. dollars.