Lesotho vs Namibia: Grants, excluding technical cooperation

Lesotho
147.56 million BoP, current US$
in 2023
Namibia
147.47 million BoP, current US$
in 2023
Lesotho rank
103rd
Namibia rank
104th

Grants, excluding technical cooperation over time

  • Lesotho
  • Namibia
0100.0M200.0M300.0M196019912023

How they compare

Lesotho currently reports 147.56 million BoP, current US$ against 147.47 million BoP, current US$ in Namibia, a difference of 94,000 BoP, current US$.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1972 it was Lesotho ahead.

Lesotho ranks 103rd and Namibia ranks 104th of 181 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Lesotho averaged higher in 2 and Namibia in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Lesotho Namibia Difference Ahead
1970s 12.12 million BoP, current US$ 0 BoP, current US$ 12.12 million BoP, current US$ Lesotho
1980s 45.91 million BoP, current US$ 8.11 million BoP, current US$ 37.80 million BoP, current US$ Lesotho
1990s 49.51 million BoP, current US$ 86.71 million BoP, current US$ 37.21 million BoP, current US$ Namibia
2000s 64.12 million BoP, current US$ 101.57 million BoP, current US$ 37.45 million BoP, current US$ Namibia
2010s 161.95 million BoP, current US$ 173.66 million BoP, current US$ 11.71 million BoP, current US$ Namibia
2020s 146.80 million BoP, current US$ 149.66 million BoP, current US$ 2.86 million BoP, current US$ Namibia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher grants, excluding technical cooperation, Lesotho or Namibia?
Lesotho, at 147.56 million BoP, current US$ against 147.47 million BoP, current US$ in Namibia as of 2023.
What is the difference in grants, excluding technical cooperation between Lesotho and Namibia?
94,000 BoP, current US$, with Lesotho ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lesotho and Namibia?
41 years are reported by both, from 1972 to 2023.
How do Lesotho and Namibia rank globally for grants, excluding technical cooperation?
Lesotho ranks 103rd and Namibia ranks 104th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
DAC2A: Aid (ODA) disbursements to countries and regions, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), published as Grants, excluding technical cooperation (BoP, current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Lesotho vs Namibia: Grants, excluding technical cooperation. Statizoid, drawing on DAC2A: Aid (ODA) disbursements to countries and regions, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/grants-excluding-technical-cooperation-bop-current-us/lesotho/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/grants-excluding-technical-cooperation-bop-current-us/lesotho/namibia/">Lesotho vs Namibia: Grants, excluding technical cooperation</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Grants, excluding technical cooperation (BoP, current US$)
Unit
BoP, current US$
Source
DAC2A: Aid (ODA) disbursements to countries and regions, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
182 places, 9,095 data points, 1960–2023
Last refreshed

Grants are transfers made in cash, goods or services for which no repayment is required. For ODA reporting purposes, they also include forgiveness of non-military debt, support to non-governmental organisations, certain interest subsidies, and certain costs incurred in the implementation of aid. Grants to multilateral agencies intended to soften the terms of the latter’s lending are a direct resource outflow and should also be recorded as ODA grants. For OOF reporting purposes, grants for commercial purposes such as subsidies to national private investors, and grants to forgive military debt, are also included. Grant-like flows are assimilated to grants. They comprise a) loans for which the service payments are to be made into an account in the borrowing country and used in the borrowing country for its own benefit, and b) provision of commodities for sale in the recipient’s currency the proceeds of which are used in the recipient country for its own benefit. Data are in current U.S. dollars.