Georgia vs Libya: Grants, excluding technical cooperation

Georgia
293.39 million BoP, current US$
in 2023
Libya
292.93 million BoP, current US$
in 2023
Georgia rank
74th
Libya rank
75th

Grants, excluding technical cooperation over time

  • Georgia
  • Libya
0200.0M400.0M600.0M196019912023

How they compare

Georgia currently reports 293.39 million BoP, current US$ against 292.93 million BoP, current US$ in Libya, a difference of 462,000 BoP, current US$.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 28 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Libya ahead.

Georgia ranks 74th and Libya ranks 75th of 181 countries.

Georgia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Georgia Libya Difference Ahead
1990s 71.21 million BoP, current US$ 1.58 million BoP, current US$ 69.63 million BoP, current US$ Georgia
2000s 329.17 million BoP, current US$ 20.79 million BoP, current US$ 308.38 million BoP, current US$ Georgia
2010s 303.63 million BoP, current US$ 200.68 million BoP, current US$ 102.95 million BoP, current US$ Georgia
2020s 294.32 million BoP, current US$ 251.96 million BoP, current US$ 42.36 million BoP, current US$ Georgia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher grants, excluding technical cooperation, Georgia or Libya?
Georgia, at 293.39 million BoP, current US$ against 292.93 million BoP, current US$ in Libya as of 2023.
What is the difference in grants, excluding technical cooperation between Georgia and Libya?
462,000 BoP, current US$, with Georgia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Libya?
28 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2023.
How do Georgia and Libya rank globally for grants, excluding technical cooperation?
Georgia ranks 74th and Libya ranks 75th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
DAC2A: Aid (ODA) disbursements to countries and regions, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), published as Grants, excluding technical cooperation (BoP, current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Georgia vs Libya: Grants, excluding technical cooperation. Statizoid, drawing on DAC2A: Aid (ODA) disbursements to countries and regions, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/grants-excluding-technical-cooperation-bop-current-us/georgia/libya/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/grants-excluding-technical-cooperation-bop-current-us/georgia/libya/">Georgia vs Libya: Grants, excluding technical cooperation</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Grants, excluding technical cooperation (BoP, current US$)
Unit
BoP, current US$
Source
DAC2A: Aid (ODA) disbursements to countries and regions, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
182 places, 9,095 data points, 1960–2023
Last refreshed

Grants are transfers made in cash, goods or services for which no repayment is required. For ODA reporting purposes, they also include forgiveness of non-military debt, support to non-governmental organisations, certain interest subsidies, and certain costs incurred in the implementation of aid. Grants to multilateral agencies intended to soften the terms of the latter’s lending are a direct resource outflow and should also be recorded as ODA grants. For OOF reporting purposes, grants for commercial purposes such as subsidies to national private investors, and grants to forgive military debt, are also included. Grant-like flows are assimilated to grants. They comprise a) loans for which the service payments are to be made into an account in the borrowing country and used in the borrowing country for its own benefit, and b) provision of commodities for sale in the recipient’s currency the proceeds of which are used in the recipient country for its own benefit. Data are in current U.S. dollars.