Gambia vs Kosovo: Grants, excluding technical cooperation
Grants, excluding technical cooperation over time
- Gambia
- Kosovo
How they compare
Kosovo currently reports 290.90 million BoP, current US$ against 285.75 million BoP, current US$ in Gambia, a difference of 5.14 million BoP, current US$.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Kosovo has been ahead every year.
Gambia ranks 79th and Kosovo ranks 76th of 181 countries.
Kosovo has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Gambia | Kosovo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 82.37 million BoP, current US$ | 421.92 million BoP, current US$ | 339.55 million BoP, current US$ | Kosovo |
| 2010s | 103.05 million BoP, current US$ | 261.93 million BoP, current US$ | 158.88 million BoP, current US$ | Kosovo |
| 2020s | 211.74 million BoP, current US$ | 282.51 million BoP, current US$ | 70.78 million BoP, current US$ | Kosovo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher grants, excluding technical cooperation, Gambia or Kosovo?
- Kosovo, at 290.90 million BoP, current US$ against 285.75 million BoP, current US$ in Gambia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in grants, excluding technical cooperation between Gambia and Kosovo?
- 5.14 million BoP, current US$, with Kosovo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Gambia and Kosovo?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2023.
- How do Gambia and Kosovo rank globally for grants, excluding technical cooperation?
- Gambia ranks 79th and Kosovo ranks 76th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- DAC2A: Aid (ODA) disbursements to countries and regions, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), published as Grants, excluding technical cooperation (BoP, current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Grants are transfers made in cash, goods or services for which no repayment is required. For ODA reporting purposes, they also include forgiveness of non-military debt, support to non-governmental organisations, certain interest subsidies, and certain costs incurred in the implementation of aid. Grants to multilateral agencies intended to soften the terms of the latter’s lending are a direct resource outflow and should also be recorded as ODA grants. For OOF reporting purposes, grants for commercial purposes such as subsidies to national private investors, and grants to forgive military debt, are also included. Grant-like flows are assimilated to grants. They comprise a) loans for which the service payments are to be made into an account in the borrowing country and used in the borrowing country for its own benefit, and b) provision of commodities for sale in the recipient’s currency the proceeds of which are used in the recipient country for its own benefit. Data are in current U.S. dollars.