Eritrea vs Sint Maarten: Grants, excluding technical cooperation

Eritrea
122.44 million BoP, current US$
in 2023
Sint Maarten
126.79 million BoP, current US$
in 1999
Eritrea rank
109th
Sint Maarten rank
106th

Grants, excluding technical cooperation over time

  • Eritrea
  • Sint Maarten
0100.0M200.0M300.0M196019912023

How they compare

Sint Maarten currently reports 126.79 million BoP, current US$ against 122.44 million BoP, current US$ in Eritrea, a difference of 4.35 million BoP, current US$.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 24 shared years of data; in 1971 it was Sint Maarten ahead.

Eritrea ranks 109th and Sint Maarten ranks 106th of 180 countries.

Sint Maarten has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eritrea Sint Maarten Difference Ahead
1970s 2.23 million BoP, current US$ 21.79 million BoP, current US$ 19.56 million BoP, current US$ Sint Maarten
1980s 3.60 million BoP, current US$ 43.28 million BoP, current US$ 39.69 million BoP, current US$ Sint Maarten
1990s 64.03 million BoP, current US$ 96.05 million BoP, current US$ 32.02 million BoP, current US$ Sint Maarten

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher grants, excluding technical cooperation, Eritrea or Sint Maarten?
Sint Maarten, at 126.79 million BoP, current US$ against 122.44 million BoP, current US$ in Eritrea as of 1999.
What is the difference in grants, excluding technical cooperation between Eritrea and Sint Maarten?
4.35 million BoP, current US$, with Sint Maarten ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Sint Maarten?
24 years are reported by both, from 1971 to 1999.
How do Eritrea and Sint Maarten rank globally for grants, excluding technical cooperation?
Eritrea ranks 109th and Sint Maarten ranks 106th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
DAC2A: Aid (ODA) disbursements to countries and regions, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), published as Grants, excluding technical cooperation (BoP, current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eritrea vs Sint Maarten: Grants, excluding technical cooperation. Statizoid, drawing on DAC2A: Aid (ODA) disbursements to countries and regions, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Retrieved 20 August 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/grants-excluding-technical-cooperation-bop-current-us/eritrea/sint-maarten-dutch-part/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/grants-excluding-technical-cooperation-bop-current-us/eritrea/sint-maarten-dutch-part/">Eritrea vs Sint Maarten: Grants, excluding technical cooperation</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Grants, excluding technical cooperation (BoP, current US$)
Unit
BoP, current US$
Source
DAC2A: Aid (ODA) disbursements to countries and regions, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
181 places, 9,080 data points, 1960–2023
Last refreshed

Grants are transfers made in cash, goods or services for which no repayment is required. For ODA reporting purposes, they also include forgiveness of non-military debt, support to non-governmental organisations, certain interest subsidies, and certain costs incurred in the implementation of aid. Grants to multilateral agencies intended to soften the terms of the latter’s lending are a direct resource outflow and should also be recorded as ODA grants. For OOF reporting purposes, grants for commercial purposes such as subsidies to national private investors, and grants to forgive military debt, are also included. Grant-like flows are assimilated to grants. They comprise a) loans for which the service payments are to be made into an account in the borrowing country and used in the borrowing country for its own benefit, and b) provision of commodities for sale in the recipient’s currency the proceeds of which are used in the recipient country for its own benefit. Data are in current U.S. dollars.