Egypt vs Serbia: Grants, excluding technical cooperation

Egypt
459.45 million BoP, current US$
in 2023
Serbia
416.50 million BoP, current US$
in 2023
Egypt rank
57th
Serbia rank
59th

Grants, excluding technical cooperation over time

  • Egypt
  • Serbia
02.0B4.0B6.0B196019912023

How they compare

Egypt currently reports 459.45 million BoP, current US$ against 416.50 million BoP, current US$ in Serbia, a difference of 42.95 million BoP, current US$.

That makes Egypt's figure about 1.1 times Serbia's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1994 it was Egypt ahead.

Egypt ranks 57th and Serbia ranks 59th of 180 countries.

Egypt has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Egypt Serbia Difference Ahead
1990s 1.12 billion BoP, current US$ 157.45 million BoP, current US$ 961.01 million BoP, current US$ Egypt
2000s 980.90 million BoP, current US$ 861.76 million BoP, current US$ 119.14 million BoP, current US$ Egypt
2010s 1.10 billion BoP, current US$ 316.27 million BoP, current US$ 781.65 million BoP, current US$ Egypt
2020s 3.02 billion BoP, current US$ 358.00 million BoP, current US$ 2.66 billion BoP, current US$ Egypt

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher grants, excluding technical cooperation, Egypt or Serbia?
Egypt, at 459.45 million BoP, current US$ against 416.50 million BoP, current US$ in Serbia as of 2023.
What is the difference in grants, excluding technical cooperation between Egypt and Serbia?
42.95 million BoP, current US$, with Egypt ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and Serbia?
30 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2023.
How do Egypt and Serbia rank globally for grants, excluding technical cooperation?
Egypt ranks 57th and Serbia ranks 59th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
DAC2A: Aid (ODA) disbursements to countries and regions, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), published as Grants, excluding technical cooperation (BoP, current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Egypt vs Serbia: Grants, excluding technical cooperation. Statizoid, drawing on DAC2A: Aid (ODA) disbursements to countries and regions, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Retrieved 20 August 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/grants-excluding-technical-cooperation-bop-current-us/egypt-arab-rep/serbia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/grants-excluding-technical-cooperation-bop-current-us/egypt-arab-rep/serbia/">Egypt vs Serbia: Grants, excluding technical cooperation</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Grants, excluding technical cooperation (BoP, current US$)
Unit
BoP, current US$
Source
DAC2A: Aid (ODA) disbursements to countries and regions, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
181 places, 9,080 data points, 1960–2023
Last refreshed

Grants are transfers made in cash, goods or services for which no repayment is required. For ODA reporting purposes, they also include forgiveness of non-military debt, support to non-governmental organisations, certain interest subsidies, and certain costs incurred in the implementation of aid. Grants to multilateral agencies intended to soften the terms of the latter’s lending are a direct resource outflow and should also be recorded as ODA grants. For OOF reporting purposes, grants for commercial purposes such as subsidies to national private investors, and grants to forgive military debt, are also included. Grant-like flows are assimilated to grants. They comprise a) loans for which the service payments are to be made into an account in the borrowing country and used in the borrowing country for its own benefit, and b) provision of commodities for sale in the recipient’s currency the proceeds of which are used in the recipient country for its own benefit. Data are in current U.S. dollars.