Ecuador vs Slovak Republic: Grants, excluding technical cooperation

Ecuador
172.30 million BoP, current US$
in 2023
Slovak Republic
183.90 million BoP, current US$
in 2004
Ecuador rank
94th
Slovak Republic rank
92nd

Grants, excluding technical cooperation over time

  • Ecuador
  • Slovak Republic
050.0M100.0M150.0M200.0M196019912023

How they compare

Slovak Republic currently reports 183.90 million BoP, current US$ against 172.30 million BoP, current US$ in Ecuador, a difference of 11.60 million BoP, current US$.

That makes Slovak Republic's figure about 1.1 times Ecuador's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 15 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Ecuador ahead.

Ecuador ranks 94th and Slovak Republic ranks 92nd of 180 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 1 and Slovak Republic in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Slovak Republic Difference Ahead
1990s 54.84 million BoP, current US$ 35.45 million BoP, current US$ 19.39 million BoP, current US$ Ecuador
2000s 92.28 million BoP, current US$ 113.55 million BoP, current US$ 21.27 million BoP, current US$ Slovak Republic

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher grants, excluding technical cooperation, Ecuador or Slovak Republic?
Slovak Republic, at 183.90 million BoP, current US$ against 172.30 million BoP, current US$ in Ecuador as of 2004.
What is the difference in grants, excluding technical cooperation between Ecuador and Slovak Republic?
11.60 million BoP, current US$, with Slovak Republic ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Slovak Republic?
15 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2004.
How do Ecuador and Slovak Republic rank globally for grants, excluding technical cooperation?
Ecuador ranks 94th and Slovak Republic ranks 92nd of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
DAC2A: Aid (ODA) disbursements to countries and regions, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), published as Grants, excluding technical cooperation (BoP, current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Slovak Republic: Grants, excluding technical cooperation. Statizoid, drawing on DAC2A: Aid (ODA) disbursements to countries and regions, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Retrieved 17 August 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/grants-excluding-technical-cooperation-bop-current-us/ecuador/slovak-republic/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/grants-excluding-technical-cooperation-bop-current-us/ecuador/slovak-republic/">Ecuador vs Slovak Republic: Grants, excluding technical cooperation</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Grants, excluding technical cooperation (BoP, current US$)
Unit
BoP, current US$
Source
DAC2A: Aid (ODA) disbursements to countries and regions, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
181 places, 9,080 data points, 1960–2023
Last refreshed

Grants are transfers made in cash, goods or services for which no repayment is required. For ODA reporting purposes, they also include forgiveness of non-military debt, support to non-governmental organisations, certain interest subsidies, and certain costs incurred in the implementation of aid. Grants to multilateral agencies intended to soften the terms of the latter’s lending are a direct resource outflow and should also be recorded as ODA grants. For OOF reporting purposes, grants for commercial purposes such as subsidies to national private investors, and grants to forgive military debt, are also included. Grant-like flows are assimilated to grants. They comprise a) loans for which the service payments are to be made into an account in the borrowing country and used in the borrowing country for its own benefit, and b) provision of commodities for sale in the recipient’s currency the proceeds of which are used in the recipient country for its own benefit. Data are in current U.S. dollars.