Cuba vs Guinea-Bissau: Grants, excluding technical cooperation (BoP, current US$)

Cuba
124.23 million BoP, current US$
in 2024
Guinea-Bissau
125.04 million BoP, current US$
in 2024
Cuba rank
111th
Guinea-Bissau rank
110th

Grants, excluding technical cooperation (BoP, current US$) over time

  • Cuba
  • Guinea-Bissau
01.0B2.0B3.0B196019922024

How they compare

Guinea-Bissau currently reports 125.04 million BoP, current US$ against 124.23 million BoP, current US$ in Cuba, a difference of 807,000 BoP, current US$.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 56 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Guinea-Bissau ahead.

Cuba ranks 111th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 110th of 181 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 2 and Guinea-Bissau in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cuba Guinea-Bissau Difference Ahead
1960s 0 BoP, current US$ 113,333 BoP, current US$ 113,333 BoP, current US$ Guinea-Bissau
1970s 15.39 million BoP, current US$ 18.58 million BoP, current US$ 3.19 million BoP, current US$ Guinea-Bissau
1980s 13.87 million BoP, current US$ 37.51 million BoP, current US$ 23.64 million BoP, current US$ Guinea-Bissau
1990s 32.84 million BoP, current US$ 47.99 million BoP, current US$ 15.15 million BoP, current US$ Guinea-Bissau
2000s 46.50 million BoP, current US$ 79.97 million BoP, current US$ 33.47 million BoP, current US$ Guinea-Bissau
2010s 532.21 million BoP, current US$ 111.28 million BoP, current US$ 420.93 million BoP, current US$ Cuba
2020s 186.26 million BoP, current US$ 115.42 million BoP, current US$ 70.84 million BoP, current US$ Cuba

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher grants, excluding technical cooperation, Cuba or Guinea-Bissau?
Guinea-Bissau, at 125.04 million BoP, current US$ against 124.23 million BoP, current US$ in Cuba as of 2024.
What is the difference in grants, excluding technical cooperation between Cuba and Guinea-Bissau?
807,000 BoP, current US$, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Guinea-Bissau?
56 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Cuba and Guinea-Bissau rank globally for grants, excluding technical cooperation?
Cuba ranks 111th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 110th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
DAC2A: Aid (ODA) disbursements to countries and regions, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), published as Grants, excluding technical cooperation (BoP, current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cuba vs Guinea-Bissau: Grants, excluding technical cooperation. Statizoid, drawing on DAC2A: Aid (ODA) disbursements to countries and regions, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Retrieved 15 November 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/grants-excluding-technical-cooperation-bop-current-us/cuba/guinea-bissau/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/grants-excluding-technical-cooperation-bop-current-us/cuba/guinea-bissau/">Cuba vs Guinea-Bissau: Grants, excluding technical cooperation</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Grants, excluding technical cooperation (BoP, current US$)
Unit
BoP, current US$
Source
DAC2A: Aid (ODA) disbursements to countries and regions, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
182 places, 9,232 data points, 1960–2024
Last refreshed

Grants are transfers made in cash, goods or services for which no repayment is required. For ODA reporting purposes, they also include forgiveness of non-military debt, support to non-governmental organisations, certain interest subsidies, and certain costs incurred in the implementation of aid. Grants to multilateral agencies intended to soften the terms of the latter’s lending are a direct resource outflow and should also be recorded as ODA grants. For OOF reporting purposes, grants for commercial purposes such as subsidies to national private investors, and grants to forgive military debt, are also included. Grant-like flows are assimilated to grants. They comprise a) loans for which the service payments are to be made into an account in the borrowing country and used in the borrowing country for its own benefit, and b) provision of commodities for sale in the recipient’s currency the proceeds of which are used in the recipient country for its own benefit. Data are in current U.S. dollars.