China vs Eswatini: Grants, excluding technical cooperation

China
103.42 million BoP, current US$
in 2023
Eswatini
112.54 million BoP, current US$
in 2023
China rank
121st
Eswatini rank
118th

Grants, excluding technical cooperation over time

  • China
  • Eswatini
0200.0M400.0M600.0M196019912023

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 112.54 million BoP, current US$ against 103.42 million BoP, current US$ in China, a difference of 9.12 million BoP, current US$.

That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.1 times China's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 45 shared years of data; in 1979 it was Eswatini ahead.

China ranks 121st and Eswatini ranks 118th of 181 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, China averaged higher in 5 and Eswatini in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade China Eswatini Difference Ahead
1970s 3.55 million BoP, current US$ 10.71 million BoP, current US$ 7.16 million BoP, current US$ Eswatini
1980s 128.09 million BoP, current US$ 10.21 million BoP, current US$ 117.89 million BoP, current US$ China
1990s 305.64 million BoP, current US$ 19.46 million BoP, current US$ 286.18 million BoP, current US$ China
2000s 423.92 million BoP, current US$ 30.44 million BoP, current US$ 393.49 million BoP, current US$ China
2010s 315.32 million BoP, current US$ 99.75 million BoP, current US$ 215.57 million BoP, current US$ China
2020s 141.99 million BoP, current US$ 108.78 million BoP, current US$ 33.21 million BoP, current US$ China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher grants, excluding technical cooperation, China or Eswatini?
Eswatini, at 112.54 million BoP, current US$ against 103.42 million BoP, current US$ in China as of 2023.
What is the difference in grants, excluding technical cooperation between China and Eswatini?
9.12 million BoP, current US$, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Eswatini?
45 years are reported by both, from 1979 to 2023.
How do China and Eswatini rank globally for grants, excluding technical cooperation?
China ranks 121st and Eswatini ranks 118th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
DAC2A: Aid (ODA) disbursements to countries and regions, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), published as Grants, excluding technical cooperation (BoP, current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs Eswatini: Grants, excluding technical cooperation. Statizoid, drawing on DAC2A: Aid (ODA) disbursements to countries and regions, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/grants-excluding-technical-cooperation-bop-current-us/china/eswatini/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/grants-excluding-technical-cooperation-bop-current-us/china/eswatini/">China vs Eswatini: Grants, excluding technical cooperation</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Grants, excluding technical cooperation (BoP, current US$)
Unit
BoP, current US$
Source
DAC2A: Aid (ODA) disbursements to countries and regions, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
182 places, 9,095 data points, 1960–2023
Last refreshed

Grants are transfers made in cash, goods or services for which no repayment is required. For ODA reporting purposes, they also include forgiveness of non-military debt, support to non-governmental organisations, certain interest subsidies, and certain costs incurred in the implementation of aid. Grants to multilateral agencies intended to soften the terms of the latter’s lending are a direct resource outflow and should also be recorded as ODA grants. For OOF reporting purposes, grants for commercial purposes such as subsidies to national private investors, and grants to forgive military debt, are also included. Grant-like flows are assimilated to grants. They comprise a) loans for which the service payments are to be made into an account in the borrowing country and used in the borrowing country for its own benefit, and b) provision of commodities for sale in the recipient’s currency the proceeds of which are used in the recipient country for its own benefit. Data are in current U.S. dollars.