China vs Croatia: Grants, excluding technical cooperation
Grants, excluding technical cooperation over time
- China
- Croatia
How they compare
Croatia currently reports 107.32 million BoP, current US$ against 103.42 million BoP, current US$ in China, a difference of 3.90 million BoP, current US$.
Across all 18 years both countries report, China has been ahead every year.
China ranks 121st and Croatia ranks 119th of 181 countries.
China has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China | Croatia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 325.60 million BoP, current US$ | 36.18 million BoP, current US$ | 289.42 million BoP, current US$ | China |
| 2000s | 423.92 million BoP, current US$ | 96.52 million BoP, current US$ | 327.41 million BoP, current US$ | China |
| 2010s | 423.17 million BoP, current US$ | 107.32 million BoP, current US$ | 315.85 million BoP, current US$ | China |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher grants, excluding technical cooperation, China or Croatia?
- Croatia, at 107.32 million BoP, current US$ against 103.42 million BoP, current US$ in China as of 2010.
- What is the difference in grants, excluding technical cooperation between China and Croatia?
- 3.90 million BoP, current US$, with Croatia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Croatia?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2010.
- How do China and Croatia rank globally for grants, excluding technical cooperation?
- China ranks 121st and Croatia ranks 119th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- DAC2A: Aid (ODA) disbursements to countries and regions, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), published as Grants, excluding technical cooperation (BoP, current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Grants are transfers made in cash, goods or services for which no repayment is required. For ODA reporting purposes, they also include forgiveness of non-military debt, support to non-governmental organisations, certain interest subsidies, and certain costs incurred in the implementation of aid. Grants to multilateral agencies intended to soften the terms of the latter’s lending are a direct resource outflow and should also be recorded as ODA grants. For OOF reporting purposes, grants for commercial purposes such as subsidies to national private investors, and grants to forgive military debt, are also included. Grant-like flows are assimilated to grants. They comprise a) loans for which the service payments are to be made into an account in the borrowing country and used in the borrowing country for its own benefit, and b) provision of commodities for sale in the recipient’s currency the proceeds of which are used in the recipient country for its own benefit. Data are in current U.S. dollars.