Botswana vs Sao Tome and Principe: Grants, excluding technical cooperation

Botswana
73.02 million BoP, current US$
in 2023
Sao Tome and Principe
73.10 million BoP, current US$
in 2023
Botswana rank
128th
Sao Tome and Principe rank
127th

Grants, excluding technical cooperation over time

  • Botswana
  • Sao Tome and Principe
0200.0M400.0M600.0M800.0M196019912023

How they compare

Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 73.10 million BoP, current US$ against 73.02 million BoP, current US$ in Botswana, a difference of 72,300 BoP, current US$.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 51 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Botswana ahead.

Botswana ranks 128th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 127th of 180 countries.

Botswana has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
1960s 9.77 million BoP, current US$ 160,000 BoP, current US$ 9.61 million BoP, current US$ Botswana
1970s 37.69 million BoP, current US$ 1.49 million BoP, current US$ 36.20 million BoP, current US$ Botswana
1980s 60.36 million BoP, current US$ 7.54 million BoP, current US$ 52.82 million BoP, current US$ Botswana
1990s 45.84 million BoP, current US$ 19.02 million BoP, current US$ 26.82 million BoP, current US$ Botswana
2000s 126.44 million BoP, current US$ 33.59 million BoP, current US$ 92.85 million BoP, current US$ Botswana
2010s 90.03 million BoP, current US$ 34.21 million BoP, current US$ 55.83 million BoP, current US$ Botswana
2020s 78.68 million BoP, current US$ 71.72 million BoP, current US$ 6.96 million BoP, current US$ Botswana

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher grants, excluding technical cooperation, Botswana or Sao Tome and Principe?
Sao Tome and Principe, at 73.10 million BoP, current US$ against 73.02 million BoP, current US$ in Botswana as of 2023.
What is the difference in grants, excluding technical cooperation between Botswana and Sao Tome and Principe?
72,300 BoP, current US$, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Sao Tome and Principe?
51 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Botswana and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for grants, excluding technical cooperation?
Botswana ranks 128th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 127th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
DAC2A: Aid (ODA) disbursements to countries and regions, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), published as Grants, excluding technical cooperation (BoP, current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Botswana vs Sao Tome and Principe: Grants, excluding technical cooperation. Statizoid, drawing on DAC2A: Aid (ODA) disbursements to countries and regions, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Retrieved 25 August 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/grants-excluding-technical-cooperation-bop-current-us/botswana/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/grants-excluding-technical-cooperation-bop-current-us/botswana/sao-tome-and-principe/">Botswana vs Sao Tome and Principe: Grants, excluding technical cooperation</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Grants, excluding technical cooperation (BoP, current US$)
Unit
BoP, current US$
Source
DAC2A: Aid (ODA) disbursements to countries and regions, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
181 places, 9,080 data points, 1960–2023
Last refreshed

Grants are transfers made in cash, goods or services for which no repayment is required. For ODA reporting purposes, they also include forgiveness of non-military debt, support to non-governmental organisations, certain interest subsidies, and certain costs incurred in the implementation of aid. Grants to multilateral agencies intended to soften the terms of the latter’s lending are a direct resource outflow and should also be recorded as ODA grants. For OOF reporting purposes, grants for commercial purposes such as subsidies to national private investors, and grants to forgive military debt, are also included. Grant-like flows are assimilated to grants. They comprise a) loans for which the service payments are to be made into an account in the borrowing country and used in the borrowing country for its own benefit, and b) provision of commodities for sale in the recipient’s currency the proceeds of which are used in the recipient country for its own benefit. Data are in current U.S. dollars.