Bolivia vs Eritrea: Grants, excluding technical cooperation (BoP, current US$)

Bolivia
162.97 million BoP, current US$
in 2024
Eritrea
160.47 million BoP, current US$
in 2024
Bolivia rank
98th
Eritrea rank
99th

Grants, excluding technical cooperation (BoP, current US$) over time

  • Bolivia
  • Eritrea
0500.0M1.0B1.5B2.0B196019922024

How they compare

Bolivia currently reports 162.97 million BoP, current US$ against 160.47 million BoP, current US$ in Eritrea, a difference of 2.50 million BoP, current US$.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 49 shared years of data; in 1971 it was Bolivia ahead.

Bolivia ranks 98th and Eritrea ranks 99th of 181 countries.

Bolivia has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bolivia Eritrea Difference Ahead
1970s 16.96 million BoP, current US$ 2.23 million BoP, current US$ 14.73 million BoP, current US$ Bolivia
1980s 91.96 million BoP, current US$ 3.60 million BoP, current US$ 88.36 million BoP, current US$ Bolivia
1990s 265.84 million BoP, current US$ 64.03 million BoP, current US$ 201.82 million BoP, current US$ Bolivia
2000s 617.91 million BoP, current US$ 146.00 million BoP, current US$ 471.91 million BoP, current US$ Bolivia
2010s 290.21 million BoP, current US$ 113.10 million BoP, current US$ 177.11 million BoP, current US$ Bolivia
2020s 176.13 million BoP, current US$ 90.79 million BoP, current US$ 85.34 million BoP, current US$ Bolivia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher grants, excluding technical cooperation, Bolivia or Eritrea?
Bolivia, at 162.97 million BoP, current US$ against 160.47 million BoP, current US$ in Eritrea as of 2024.
What is the difference in grants, excluding technical cooperation between Bolivia and Eritrea?
2.50 million BoP, current US$, with Bolivia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bolivia and Eritrea?
49 years are reported by both, from 1971 to 2024.
How do Bolivia and Eritrea rank globally for grants, excluding technical cooperation?
Bolivia ranks 98th and Eritrea ranks 99th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
DAC2A: Aid (ODA) disbursements to countries and regions, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), published as Grants, excluding technical cooperation (BoP, current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bolivia vs Eritrea: Grants, excluding technical cooperation. Statizoid, drawing on DAC2A: Aid (ODA) disbursements to countries and regions, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Retrieved 15 November 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/grants-excluding-technical-cooperation-bop-current-us/bolivia/eritrea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/grants-excluding-technical-cooperation-bop-current-us/bolivia/eritrea/">Bolivia vs Eritrea: Grants, excluding technical cooperation</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Grants, excluding technical cooperation (BoP, current US$)
Unit
BoP, current US$
Source
DAC2A: Aid (ODA) disbursements to countries and regions, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
182 places, 9,232 data points, 1960–2024
Last refreshed

Grants are transfers made in cash, goods or services for which no repayment is required. For ODA reporting purposes, they also include forgiveness of non-military debt, support to non-governmental organisations, certain interest subsidies, and certain costs incurred in the implementation of aid. Grants to multilateral agencies intended to soften the terms of the latter’s lending are a direct resource outflow and should also be recorded as ODA grants. For OOF reporting purposes, grants for commercial purposes such as subsidies to national private investors, and grants to forgive military debt, are also included. Grant-like flows are assimilated to grants. They comprise a) loans for which the service payments are to be made into an account in the borrowing country and used in the borrowing country for its own benefit, and b) provision of commodities for sale in the recipient’s currency the proceeds of which are used in the recipient country for its own benefit. Data are in current U.S. dollars.