Belarus vs Tuvalu: Grants, excluding technical cooperation (BoP, current US$)

Belarus
85.90 million BoP, current US$
in 2024
Tuvalu
98.74 million BoP, current US$
in 2024
Belarus rank
122nd
Tuvalu rank
119th

Grants, excluding technical cooperation (BoP, current US$) over time

  • Belarus
  • Tuvalu
025.0M50.0M75.0M100.0M197519992024

How they compare

Tuvalu currently reports 98.74 million BoP, current US$ against 85.90 million BoP, current US$ in Belarus, a difference of 12.85 million BoP, current US$.

That makes Tuvalu's figure about 1.1 times Belarus's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 20 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Belarus ahead.

Belarus ranks 122nd and Tuvalu ranks 119th of 181 countries.

Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Tuvalu Difference Ahead
2000s 57.75 million BoP, current US$ 9.72 million BoP, current US$ 48.02 million BoP, current US$ Belarus
2010s 71.26 million BoP, current US$ 24.07 million BoP, current US$ 47.19 million BoP, current US$ Belarus
2020s 82.79 million BoP, current US$ 59.08 million BoP, current US$ 23.71 million BoP, current US$ Belarus

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher grants, excluding technical cooperation, Belarus or Tuvalu?
Tuvalu, at 98.74 million BoP, current US$ against 85.90 million BoP, current US$ in Belarus as of 2024.
What is the difference in grants, excluding technical cooperation between Belarus and Tuvalu?
12.85 million BoP, current US$, with Tuvalu ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Tuvalu?
20 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2024.
How do Belarus and Tuvalu rank globally for grants, excluding technical cooperation?
Belarus ranks 122nd and Tuvalu ranks 119th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
DAC2A: Aid (ODA) disbursements to countries and regions, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), published as Grants, excluding technical cooperation (BoP, current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Tuvalu: Grants, excluding technical cooperation. Statizoid, drawing on DAC2A: Aid (ODA) disbursements to countries and regions, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Retrieved 15 November 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/grants-excluding-technical-cooperation-bop-current-us/belarus/tuvalu/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/grants-excluding-technical-cooperation-bop-current-us/belarus/tuvalu/">Belarus vs Tuvalu: Grants, excluding technical cooperation</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Grants, excluding technical cooperation (BoP, current US$)
Unit
BoP, current US$
Source
DAC2A: Aid (ODA) disbursements to countries and regions, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
182 places, 9,232 data points, 1960–2024
Last refreshed

Grants are transfers made in cash, goods or services for which no repayment is required. For ODA reporting purposes, they also include forgiveness of non-military debt, support to non-governmental organisations, certain interest subsidies, and certain costs incurred in the implementation of aid. Grants to multilateral agencies intended to soften the terms of the latter’s lending are a direct resource outflow and should also be recorded as ODA grants. For OOF reporting purposes, grants for commercial purposes such as subsidies to national private investors, and grants to forgive military debt, are also included. Grant-like flows are assimilated to grants. They comprise a) loans for which the service payments are to be made into an account in the borrowing country and used in the borrowing country for its own benefit, and b) provision of commodities for sale in the recipient’s currency the proceeds of which are used in the recipient country for its own benefit. Data are in current U.S. dollars.