Belarus vs Kiribati: Grants, excluding technical cooperation
Grants, excluding technical cooperation over time
- Belarus
- Kiribati
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 96.42 million BoP, current US$ against 96.28 million BoP, current US$ in Kiribati, a difference of 142,000 BoP, current US$.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Belarus ahead.
Belarus ranks 120th and Kiribati ranks 121st of 179 countries.
Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Kiribati | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 57.75 million BoP, current US$ | 16.60 million BoP, current US$ | 41.15 million BoP, current US$ | Belarus |
| 2010s | 71.26 million BoP, current US$ | 44.79 million BoP, current US$ | 26.47 million BoP, current US$ | Belarus |
| 2020s | 82.01 million BoP, current US$ | 67.68 million BoP, current US$ | 14.33 million BoP, current US$ | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher grants, excluding technical cooperation, Belarus or Kiribati?
- Belarus, at 96.42 million BoP, current US$ against 96.28 million BoP, current US$ in Kiribati as of 2023.
- What is the difference in grants, excluding technical cooperation between Belarus and Kiribati?
- 142,000 BoP, current US$, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Kiribati?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2023.
- How do Belarus and Kiribati rank globally for grants, excluding technical cooperation?
- Belarus ranks 120th and Kiribati ranks 121st of 179 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- DAC2A: Aid (ODA) disbursements to countries and regions, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), published as Grants, excluding technical cooperation (BoP, current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Grants are transfers made in cash, goods or services for which no repayment is required. For ODA reporting purposes, they also include forgiveness of non-military debt, support to non-governmental organisations, certain interest subsidies, and certain costs incurred in the implementation of aid. Grants to multilateral agencies intended to soften the terms of the latter’s lending are a direct resource outflow and should also be recorded as ODA grants. For OOF reporting purposes, grants for commercial purposes such as subsidies to national private investors, and grants to forgive military debt, are also included. Grant-like flows are assimilated to grants. They comprise a) loans for which the service payments are to be made into an account in the borrowing country and used in the borrowing country for its own benefit, and b) provision of commodities for sale in the recipient’s currency the proceeds of which are used in the recipient country for its own benefit. Data are in current U.S. dollars.