Azerbaijan vs China: Grants, excluding technical cooperation

Azerbaijan
89.48 million BoP, current US$
in 2023
China
103.42 million BoP, current US$
in 2023
Azerbaijan rank
124th
China rank
121st

Grants, excluding technical cooperation over time

  • Azerbaijan
  • China
0200.0M400.0M600.0M197920012023

How they compare

China currently reports 103.42 million BoP, current US$ against 89.48 million BoP, current US$ in Azerbaijan, a difference of 13.94 million BoP, current US$.

That makes China's figure about 1.2 times Azerbaijan's.

Across all 33 years both countries report, China has been ahead every year.

Azerbaijan ranks 124th and China ranks 121st of 181 countries.

China has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Azerbaijan China Difference Ahead
1990s 43.88 million BoP, current US$ 310.80 million BoP, current US$ 266.92 million BoP, current US$ China
2000s 73.27 million BoP, current US$ 423.92 million BoP, current US$ 350.65 million BoP, current US$ China
2010s 76.33 million BoP, current US$ 315.32 million BoP, current US$ 238.99 million BoP, current US$ China
2020s 59.29 million BoP, current US$ 141.99 million BoP, current US$ 82.70 million BoP, current US$ China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher grants, excluding technical cooperation, Azerbaijan or China?
China, at 103.42 million BoP, current US$ against 89.48 million BoP, current US$ in Azerbaijan as of 2023.
What is the difference in grants, excluding technical cooperation between Azerbaijan and China?
13.94 million BoP, current US$, with China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and China?
33 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2023.
How do Azerbaijan and China rank globally for grants, excluding technical cooperation?
Azerbaijan ranks 124th and China ranks 121st of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
DAC2A: Aid (ODA) disbursements to countries and regions, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), published as Grants, excluding technical cooperation (BoP, current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Azerbaijan vs China: Grants, excluding technical cooperation. Statizoid, drawing on DAC2A: Aid (ODA) disbursements to countries and regions, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/grants-excluding-technical-cooperation-bop-current-us/azerbaijan/china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/grants-excluding-technical-cooperation-bop-current-us/azerbaijan/china/">Azerbaijan vs China: Grants, excluding technical cooperation</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Grants, excluding technical cooperation (BoP, current US$)
Unit
BoP, current US$
Source
DAC2A: Aid (ODA) disbursements to countries and regions, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
182 places, 9,095 data points, 1960–2023
Last refreshed

Grants are transfers made in cash, goods or services for which no repayment is required. For ODA reporting purposes, they also include forgiveness of non-military debt, support to non-governmental organisations, certain interest subsidies, and certain costs incurred in the implementation of aid. Grants to multilateral agencies intended to soften the terms of the latter’s lending are a direct resource outflow and should also be recorded as ODA grants. For OOF reporting purposes, grants for commercial purposes such as subsidies to national private investors, and grants to forgive military debt, are also included. Grant-like flows are assimilated to grants. They comprise a) loans for which the service payments are to be made into an account in the borrowing country and used in the borrowing country for its own benefit, and b) provision of commodities for sale in the recipient’s currency the proceeds of which are used in the recipient country for its own benefit. Data are in current U.S. dollars.