Azerbaijan vs Belarus: Grants, excluding technical cooperation

Azerbaijan
89.48 million BoP, current US$
in 2023
Belarus
96.42 million BoP, current US$
in 2023
Azerbaijan rank
124th
Belarus rank
122nd

Grants, excluding technical cooperation over time

  • Azerbaijan
  • Belarus
050.0M100.0M150.0M199120072023

How they compare

Belarus currently reports 96.42 million BoP, current US$ against 89.48 million BoP, current US$ in Azerbaijan, a difference of 6.94 million BoP, current US$.

That makes Belarus's figure about 1.1 times Azerbaijan's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Azerbaijan ahead.

Azerbaijan ranks 124th and Belarus ranks 122nd of 181 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Azerbaijan averaged higher in 2 and Belarus in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Azerbaijan Belarus Difference Ahead
2000s 89.75 million BoP, current US$ 57.75 million BoP, current US$ 32.00 million BoP, current US$ Azerbaijan
2010s 76.33 million BoP, current US$ 71.26 million BoP, current US$ 5.07 million BoP, current US$ Azerbaijan
2020s 59.29 million BoP, current US$ 82.01 million BoP, current US$ 22.72 million BoP, current US$ Belarus

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher grants, excluding technical cooperation, Azerbaijan or Belarus?
Belarus, at 96.42 million BoP, current US$ against 89.48 million BoP, current US$ in Azerbaijan as of 2023.
What is the difference in grants, excluding technical cooperation between Azerbaijan and Belarus?
6.94 million BoP, current US$, with Belarus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and Belarus?
19 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2023.
How do Azerbaijan and Belarus rank globally for grants, excluding technical cooperation?
Azerbaijan ranks 124th and Belarus ranks 122nd of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
DAC2A: Aid (ODA) disbursements to countries and regions, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), published as Grants, excluding technical cooperation (BoP, current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Azerbaijan vs Belarus: Grants, excluding technical cooperation. Statizoid, drawing on DAC2A: Aid (ODA) disbursements to countries and regions, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/grants-excluding-technical-cooperation-bop-current-us/azerbaijan/belarus/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/grants-excluding-technical-cooperation-bop-current-us/azerbaijan/belarus/">Azerbaijan vs Belarus: Grants, excluding technical cooperation</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Grants, excluding technical cooperation (BoP, current US$)
Unit
BoP, current US$
Source
DAC2A: Aid (ODA) disbursements to countries and regions, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
182 places, 9,095 data points, 1960–2023
Last refreshed

Grants are transfers made in cash, goods or services for which no repayment is required. For ODA reporting purposes, they also include forgiveness of non-military debt, support to non-governmental organisations, certain interest subsidies, and certain costs incurred in the implementation of aid. Grants to multilateral agencies intended to soften the terms of the latter’s lending are a direct resource outflow and should also be recorded as ODA grants. For OOF reporting purposes, grants for commercial purposes such as subsidies to national private investors, and grants to forgive military debt, are also included. Grant-like flows are assimilated to grants. They comprise a) loans for which the service payments are to be made into an account in the borrowing country and used in the borrowing country for its own benefit, and b) provision of commodities for sale in the recipient’s currency the proceeds of which are used in the recipient country for its own benefit. Data are in current U.S. dollars.