Aruba vs Gibraltar: Grants, excluding technical cooperation
Grants, excluding technical cooperation over time
- Aruba
- Gibraltar
How they compare
Aruba currently reports 40,000 BoP, current US$ against 0 BoP, current US$ in Gibraltar, a difference of 40,000 BoP, current US$.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 14 shared years of data; in 1986 it was Gibraltar ahead.
Aruba ranks 174th and Gibraltar ranks 175th of 179 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Aruba averaged higher in 1 and Gibraltar in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Aruba | Gibraltar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 10.60 million BoP, current US$ | 12.87 million BoP, current US$ | 2.27 million BoP, current US$ | Gibraltar |
| 1990s | 22.10 million BoP, current US$ | 649,000 BoP, current US$ | 21.45 million BoP, current US$ | Aruba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher grants, excluding technical cooperation, Aruba or Gibraltar?
- Aruba, at 40,000 BoP, current US$ against 0 BoP, current US$ in Gibraltar as of 1999.
- What is the difference in grants, excluding technical cooperation between Aruba and Gibraltar?
- 40,000 BoP, current US$, with Aruba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Gibraltar?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 1986 to 1999.
- How do Aruba and Gibraltar rank globally for grants, excluding technical cooperation?
- Aruba ranks 174th and Gibraltar ranks 175th of 179 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- DAC2A: Aid (ODA) disbursements to countries and regions, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), published as Grants, excluding technical cooperation (BoP, current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Grants are transfers made in cash, goods or services for which no repayment is required. For ODA reporting purposes, they also include forgiveness of non-military debt, support to non-governmental organisations, certain interest subsidies, and certain costs incurred in the implementation of aid. Grants to multilateral agencies intended to soften the terms of the latter’s lending are a direct resource outflow and should also be recorded as ODA grants. For OOF reporting purposes, grants for commercial purposes such as subsidies to national private investors, and grants to forgive military debt, are also included. Grant-like flows are assimilated to grants. They comprise a) loans for which the service payments are to be made into an account in the borrowing country and used in the borrowing country for its own benefit, and b) provision of commodities for sale in the recipient’s currency the proceeds of which are used in the recipient country for its own benefit. Data are in current U.S. dollars.