Nauru vs Tuvalu: Grants, excluding technical cooperation (BoP, current US$), per

Nauru
1.77 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Tuvalu
2.21 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Nauru rank
2nd
Tuvalu rank
1st

Grants, excluding technical cooperation (BoP, current US$), per over time

  • Nauru
  • Tuvalu
0500.0k1.0M1.5M2.0M2.5M197519992023

How they compare

Tuvalu currently reports 2.21 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 1.77 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Nauru, a difference of 445,690 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Tuvalu's figure about 1.3 times Nauru's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 47 shared years of data; in 1975 it was Tuvalu ahead.

Nauru ranks 2nd and Tuvalu ranks 1st of 178 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Nauru averaged higher in 2 and Tuvalu in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Nauru Tuvalu Difference Ahead
1970s 166.67 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 63,333 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 63,167 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Tuvalu
1980s 250 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 202,700 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 202,450 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Tuvalu
1990s 71,300 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 111,733 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 40,433 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Tuvalu
2000s 501,646 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 238,918 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 262,728 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Nauru
2010s 899,922 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 802,232 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 97,690 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Nauru
2020s 1.45 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 1.64 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 187,524 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Tuvalu

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher grants, excluding technical cooperation (bop, current us$), per, Nauru or Tuvalu?
Tuvalu, at 2.21 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 1.77 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Nauru as of 2023.
What is the difference in grants, excluding technical cooperation (bop, current us$), per between Nauru and Tuvalu?
445,690 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre, with Tuvalu ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Nauru and Tuvalu?
47 years are reported by both, from 1975 to 2023.
How do Nauru and Tuvalu rank globally for grants, excluding technical cooperation (bop, current us$), per?
Nauru ranks 2nd and Tuvalu ranks 1st of 178 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Grants, excluding technical cooperation (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Nauru vs Tuvalu: Grants, excluding technical cooperation (BoP, current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/grants-excluding-technical-cooperation-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/naoero/tuvalu/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/grants-excluding-technical-cooperation-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/naoero/tuvalu/">Nauru vs Tuvalu: Grants, excluding technical cooperation (BoP, current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Grants, excluding technical cooperation (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
179 places, 8,757 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Grants, excluding technical cooperation (BoP, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.