Namibia vs Suriname: Grants, excluding technical cooperation (BoP, current US$), per

Namibia
179.12 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Suriname
189.93 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Namibia rank
146th
Suriname rank
145th

Grants, excluding technical cooperation (BoP, current US$), per over time

  • Namibia
  • Suriname
02004006008001.0k196119922023

How they compare

Suriname currently reports 189.93 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 179.12 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Namibia, a difference of 10.81 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Suriname's figure about 1.1 times Namibia's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1972 it was Suriname ahead.

Namibia ranks 146th and Suriname ranks 145th of 178 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Namibia averaged higher in 2 and Suriname in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Namibia Suriname Difference Ahead
1970s 0 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 97.57 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 97.57 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Suriname
1980s 9.84 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 92.78 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 82.93 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Suriname
1990s 105.33 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 190.13 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 84.81 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Suriname
2000s 123.38 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 385.13 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 261.75 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Suriname
2010s 210.93 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 176.88 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 34.05 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Namibia
2020s 181.78 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 137.77 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 44.02 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Namibia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher grants, excluding technical cooperation (bop, current us$), per, Namibia or Suriname?
Suriname, at 189.93 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 179.12 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Namibia as of 2023.
What is the difference in grants, excluding technical cooperation (bop, current us$), per between Namibia and Suriname?
10.81 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre, with Suriname ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and Suriname?
41 years are reported by both, from 1972 to 2023.
How do Namibia and Suriname rank globally for grants, excluding technical cooperation (bop, current us$), per?
Namibia ranks 146th and Suriname ranks 145th of 178 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Grants, excluding technical cooperation (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Namibia vs Suriname: Grants, excluding technical cooperation (BoP, current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/grants-excluding-technical-cooperation-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/namibia/suriname/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/grants-excluding-technical-cooperation-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/namibia/suriname/">Namibia vs Suriname: Grants, excluding technical cooperation (BoP, current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Grants, excluding technical cooperation (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
179 places, 8,757 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Grants, excluding technical cooperation (BoP, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.