Mexico vs Namibia: Grants, excluding technical cooperation (BoP, current US$), per

Mexico
161.32 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Namibia
179.12 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Mexico rank
149th
Namibia rank
146th

Grants, excluding technical cooperation (BoP, current US$), per over time

  • Mexico
  • Namibia
0100200300196119922023

How they compare

Namibia currently reports 179.12 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 161.32 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Mexico, a difference of 17.8 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Namibia's figure about 1.1 times Mexico's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1972 it was Mexico ahead.

Mexico ranks 149th and Namibia ranks 146th of 178 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Mexico averaged higher in 2 and Namibia in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mexico Namibia Difference Ahead
1970s 8.54 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 0 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 8.54 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Mexico
1980s 33.34 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 9.84 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 23.5 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Mexico
1990s 21.87 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 105.33 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 83.46 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Namibia
2000s 44.45 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 123.38 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 78.93 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Namibia
2010s 147.46 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 210.93 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 63.47 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Namibia
2020s 149.6 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 181.78 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 32.18 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Namibia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher grants, excluding technical cooperation (bop, current us$), per, Mexico or Namibia?
Namibia, at 179.12 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 161.32 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Mexico as of 2023.
What is the difference in grants, excluding technical cooperation (bop, current us$), per between Mexico and Namibia?
17.8 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre, with Namibia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mexico and Namibia?
41 years are reported by both, from 1972 to 2023.
How do Mexico and Namibia rank globally for grants, excluding technical cooperation (bop, current us$), per?
Mexico ranks 149th and Namibia ranks 146th of 178 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Grants, excluding technical cooperation (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mexico vs Namibia: Grants, excluding technical cooperation (BoP, current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/grants-excluding-technical-cooperation-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/mexico/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/grants-excluding-technical-cooperation-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/mexico/namibia/">Mexico vs Namibia: Grants, excluding technical cooperation (BoP, current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Grants, excluding technical cooperation (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
179 places, 8,757 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Grants, excluding technical cooperation (BoP, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.