Latvia vs Zimbabwe: Grants, excluding technical cooperation (BoP, current US$), per

Latvia
2,380 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2004
Zimbabwe
1,939 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Latvia rank
95th
Zimbabwe rank
97th

Grants, excluding technical cooperation (BoP, current US$), per over time

  • Latvia
  • Zimbabwe
05001.0k1.5k2.0k2.5k196119922023

How they compare

Latvia currently reports 2,380 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 1,939 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, a difference of 441 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Latvia's figure about 1.2 times Zimbabwe's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 13 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Latvia ranks 95th and Zimbabwe ranks 97th of 178 countries.

Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Latvia Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s 700.8 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 548.98 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 151.82 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Latvia
2000s 1,475 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 328.79 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 1,146 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Latvia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher grants, excluding technical cooperation (bop, current us$), per, Latvia or Zimbabwe?
Latvia, at 2,380 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 1,939 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Zimbabwe as of 2004.
What is the difference in grants, excluding technical cooperation (bop, current us$), per between Latvia and Zimbabwe?
441 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre, with Latvia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Zimbabwe?
13 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2004.
How do Latvia and Zimbabwe rank globally for grants, excluding technical cooperation (bop, current us$), per?
Latvia ranks 95th and Zimbabwe ranks 97th of 178 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Grants, excluding technical cooperation (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Latvia vs Zimbabwe: Grants, excluding technical cooperation (BoP, current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/grants-excluding-technical-cooperation-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/latvia/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/grants-excluding-technical-cooperation-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/latvia/zimbabwe/">Latvia vs Zimbabwe: Grants, excluding technical cooperation (BoP, current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Grants, excluding technical cooperation (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
179 places, 8,757 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Grants, excluding technical cooperation (BoP, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.