Cuba vs Myanmar: Grants, excluding technical cooperation (BoP, current US$), per

Cuba
1,345 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Myanmar
1,316 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Cuba rank
107th
Myanmar rank
110th

Grants, excluding technical cooperation (BoP, current US$), per over time

  • Cuba
  • Myanmar
05.0k10.0k15.0k20.0k25.0k196119922023

How they compare

Cuba currently reports 1,345 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 1,316 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Myanmar, a difference of 29 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 11 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Myanmar ahead.

Cuba ranks 107th and Myanmar ranks 110th of 178 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 6 and Myanmar in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cuba Myanmar Difference Ahead
1960s 0.6621 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 29.51 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 28.85 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Myanmar
1970s 115.45 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 35.19 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 80.26 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Cuba
1980s 129.13 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 100.75 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 28.38 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Cuba
1990s 305.8 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 113.03 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 192.77 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Cuba
2000s 436.36 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 238.17 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 198.19 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Cuba
2010s 5,114 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 1,880 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 3,234 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Cuba
2020s 1,944 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 1,382 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 561.7 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Cuba

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher grants, excluding technical cooperation (bop, current us$), per, Cuba or Myanmar?
Cuba, at 1,345 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 1,316 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Myanmar as of 2023.
What is the difference in grants, excluding technical cooperation (bop, current us$), per between Cuba and Myanmar?
29 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre, with Cuba ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Myanmar?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Cuba and Myanmar rank globally for grants, excluding technical cooperation (bop, current us$), per?
Cuba ranks 107th and Myanmar ranks 110th of 178 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Grants, excluding technical cooperation (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cuba vs Myanmar: Grants, excluding technical cooperation (BoP, current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/grants-excluding-technical-cooperation-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/cuba/myanmar/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/grants-excluding-technical-cooperation-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/cuba/myanmar/">Cuba vs Myanmar: Grants, excluding technical cooperation (BoP, current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Grants, excluding technical cooperation (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
179 places, 8,757 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Grants, excluding technical cooperation (BoP, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.