Cuba vs Laos: Grants, excluding technical cooperation (BoP, current US$), per

Cuba
1,345 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Laos
1,507 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Cuba rank
107th
Laos rank
105th

Grants, excluding technical cooperation (BoP, current US$), per over time

  • Cuba
  • Laos
05.0k10.0k15.0k20.0k25.0k196119922023

How they compare

Laos currently reports 1,507 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 1,345 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Cuba, a difference of 162 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Laos's figure about 1.1 times Cuba's.

The two have swapped places 12 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Laos ahead.

Cuba ranks 107th and Laos ranks 105th of 178 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 4 and Laos in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cuba Laos Difference Ahead
1960s 0.6621 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 160.62 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 159.95 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Laos
1970s 115.45 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 109.29 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 6.16 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Cuba
1980s 129.13 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 94.29 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 34.85 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Cuba
1990s 305.8 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 417.91 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 112.11 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Laos
2000s 436.36 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 667.5 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 231.14 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Laos
2010s 5,114 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 1,303 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 3,810 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Cuba
2020s 1,944 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 1,541 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 402.98 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Cuba

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher grants, excluding technical cooperation (bop, current us$), per, Cuba or Laos?
Laos, at 1,507 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 1,345 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Cuba as of 2023.
What is the difference in grants, excluding technical cooperation (bop, current us$), per between Cuba and Laos?
162 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre, with Laos ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Laos?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Cuba and Laos rank globally for grants, excluding technical cooperation (bop, current us$), per?
Cuba ranks 107th and Laos ranks 105th of 178 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Grants, excluding technical cooperation (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cuba vs Laos: Grants, excluding technical cooperation (BoP, current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/grants-excluding-technical-cooperation-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/cuba/lao-pdr/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/grants-excluding-technical-cooperation-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/cuba/lao-pdr/">Cuba vs Laos: Grants, excluding technical cooperation (BoP, current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Grants, excluding technical cooperation (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
179 places, 8,757 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Grants, excluding technical cooperation (BoP, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.