Bolivia vs Namibia: Grants, excluding technical cooperation (BoP, current US$), per

Bolivia
168.17 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Namibia
179.12 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Bolivia rank
147th
Namibia rank
146th

Grants, excluding technical cooperation (BoP, current US$), per over time

  • Bolivia
  • Namibia
05001.0k1.5k2.0k196119922023

How they compare

Namibia currently reports 179.12 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 168.17 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Bolivia, a difference of 10.95 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Namibia's figure about 1.1 times Bolivia's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1972 it was Bolivia ahead.

Bolivia ranks 147th and Namibia ranks 146th of 178 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Bolivia averaged higher in 5 and Namibia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bolivia Namibia Difference Ahead
1970s 4.33 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 0 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 4.33 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Bolivia
1980s 119.39 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 9.84 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 109.54 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Bolivia
1990s 272.52 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 105.33 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 167.2 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Bolivia
2000s 570.4 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 123.38 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 447.02 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Bolivia
2010s 267.89 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 210.93 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 56.96 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Bolivia
2020s 165.63 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 181.78 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 16.15 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Namibia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher grants, excluding technical cooperation (bop, current us$), per, Bolivia or Namibia?
Namibia, at 179.12 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 168.17 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Bolivia as of 2023.
What is the difference in grants, excluding technical cooperation (bop, current us$), per between Bolivia and Namibia?
10.95 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre, with Namibia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bolivia and Namibia?
41 years are reported by both, from 1972 to 2023.
How do Bolivia and Namibia rank globally for grants, excluding technical cooperation (bop, current us$), per?
Bolivia ranks 147th and Namibia ranks 146th of 178 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Grants, excluding technical cooperation (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bolivia vs Namibia: Grants, excluding technical cooperation (BoP, current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/grants-excluding-technical-cooperation-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/bolivia/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/grants-excluding-technical-cooperation-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/bolivia/namibia/">Bolivia vs Namibia: Grants, excluding technical cooperation (BoP, current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Grants, excluding technical cooperation (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
179 places, 8,757 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Grants, excluding technical cooperation (BoP, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.