Barbados vs Samoa: Grants, excluding technical cooperation (BoP, current US$), per

Barbados
32,000 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2010
Samoa
41,154 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Barbados rank
19th
Samoa rank
16th

Grants, excluding technical cooperation (BoP, current US$), per over time

  • Barbados
  • Samoa
010.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k50.0k196119922023

How they compare

Samoa currently reports 41,154 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 32,000 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Barbados, a difference of 9,154 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Samoa's figure about 1.3 times Barbados's.

The two have swapped places 14 times across 45 shared years of data; in 1966 it was Barbados ahead.

Barbados ranks 19th and Samoa ranks 16th of 178 countries.

Barbados has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Barbados Samoa Difference Ahead
1960s 1,041 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 18.55 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 1,022 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Barbados
1970s 1,809 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 1,750 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 59.12 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Barbados
1980s 5,140 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 4,317 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 822.93 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Barbados
1990s 8,447 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 5,902 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 2,545 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Barbados
2000s 9,800 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 5,715 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 4,085 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Barbados
2010s 32,000 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 21,141 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 10,859 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Barbados

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher grants, excluding technical cooperation (bop, current us$), per, Barbados or Samoa?
Samoa, at 41,154 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 32,000 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Barbados as of 2023.
What is the difference in grants, excluding technical cooperation (bop, current us$), per between Barbados and Samoa?
9,154 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre, with Samoa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Samoa?
45 years are reported by both, from 1966 to 2010.
How do Barbados and Samoa rank globally for grants, excluding technical cooperation (bop, current us$), per?
Barbados ranks 19th and Samoa ranks 16th of 178 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Grants, excluding technical cooperation (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Barbados vs Samoa: Grants, excluding technical cooperation (BoP, current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/grants-excluding-technical-cooperation-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/barbados/samoa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/grants-excluding-technical-cooperation-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/barbados/samoa/">Barbados vs Samoa: Grants, excluding technical cooperation (BoP, current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Grants, excluding technical cooperation (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
179 places, 8,757 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Grants, excluding technical cooperation (BoP, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.