Barbados vs Gambia: Grants, excluding technical cooperation (BoP, current US$), per

Barbados
32,000 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2010
Gambia
28,237 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Barbados rank
19th
Gambia rank
22nd

Grants, excluding technical cooperation (BoP, current US$), per over time

  • Barbados
  • Gambia
010.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k50.0k196119922023

How they compare

Barbados currently reports 32,000 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 28,237 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Gambia, a difference of 3,763 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Barbados's figure about 1.1 times Gambia's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 45 shared years of data; in 1966 it was Barbados ahead.

Barbados ranks 19th and Gambia ranks 22nd of 178 countries.

Barbados has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Barbados Gambia Difference Ahead
1960s 1,041 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 186.76 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 853.94 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Barbados
1970s 1,809 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 526.78 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 1,283 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Barbados
1980s 5,140 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 3,301 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 1,839 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Barbados
1990s 8,447 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 2,978 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 5,468 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Barbados
2000s 9,800 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 5,853 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 3,947 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Barbados
2010s 32,000 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 8,221 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 23,779 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Barbados

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher grants, excluding technical cooperation (bop, current us$), per, Barbados or Gambia?
Barbados, at 32,000 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 28,237 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Gambia as of 2010.
What is the difference in grants, excluding technical cooperation (bop, current us$), per between Barbados and Gambia?
3,763 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre, with Barbados ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Gambia?
45 years are reported by both, from 1966 to 2010.
How do Barbados and Gambia rank globally for grants, excluding technical cooperation (bop, current us$), per?
Barbados ranks 19th and Gambia ranks 22nd of 178 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Grants, excluding technical cooperation (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Barbados vs Gambia: Grants, excluding technical cooperation (BoP, current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/grants-excluding-technical-cooperation-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/barbados/gambia-the/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/grants-excluding-technical-cooperation-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/barbados/gambia-the/">Barbados vs Gambia: Grants, excluding technical cooperation (BoP, current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Grants, excluding technical cooperation (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
179 places, 8,757 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Grants, excluding technical cooperation (BoP, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.