Aruba vs Namibia: Grants, excluding technical cooperation (BoP, current US$), per

Aruba
222.22 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 1999
Namibia
179.12 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Aruba rank
143rd
Namibia rank
146th

Grants, excluding technical cooperation (BoP, current US$), per over time

  • Aruba
  • Namibia
050.0k100.0k150.0k200.0k197219972023

How they compare

Aruba currently reports 222.22 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 179.12 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Namibia, a difference of 43.1 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Aruba's figure about 1.2 times Namibia's.

Across all 14 years both countries report, Aruba has been ahead every year.

Aruba ranks 143rd and Namibia ranks 146th of 178 countries.

Aruba has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Aruba Namibia Difference Ahead
1980s 58,875 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 14.89 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 58,860 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Aruba
1990s 122,800 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 105.33 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 122,695 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Aruba

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher grants, excluding technical cooperation (bop, current us$), per, Aruba or Namibia?
Aruba, at 222.22 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 179.12 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Namibia as of 1999.
What is the difference in grants, excluding technical cooperation (bop, current us$), per between Aruba and Namibia?
43.1 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre, with Aruba ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Namibia?
14 years are reported by both, from 1986 to 1999.
How do Aruba and Namibia rank globally for grants, excluding technical cooperation (bop, current us$), per?
Aruba ranks 143rd and Namibia ranks 146th of 178 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Grants, excluding technical cooperation (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Aruba vs Namibia: Grants, excluding technical cooperation (BoP, current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/grants-excluding-technical-cooperation-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/aruba/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/grants-excluding-technical-cooperation-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/aruba/namibia/">Aruba vs Namibia: Grants, excluding technical cooperation (BoP, current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Grants, excluding technical cooperation (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
179 places, 8,757 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Grants, excluding technical cooperation (BoP, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.