Guatemala vs Nicaragua: Grants, excluding technical cooperation (BoP, current US$), per capita

Guatemala
20.97 BoP, current US$ per person
in 2023
Nicaragua
22.17 BoP, current US$ per person
in 2023
Guatemala rank
115th
Nicaragua rank
112th

Grants, excluding technical cooperation (BoP, current US$), per capita over time

  • Guatemala
  • Nicaragua
0100200300196019912023

How they compare

Nicaragua currently reports 22.17 BoP, current US$ per person against 20.97 BoP, current US$ per person in Guatemala, a difference of 1.2 BoP, current US$ per person.

That makes Nicaragua's figure about 1.1 times Guatemala's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Guatemala ahead.

Guatemala ranks 115th and Nicaragua ranks 112th of 181 countries.

Nicaragua has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guatemala Nicaragua Difference Ahead
1960s 1.82 BoP, current US$ per person 2.28 BoP, current US$ per person 0.4661 BoP, current US$ per person Nicaragua
1970s 1.54 BoP, current US$ per person 2.1 BoP, current US$ per person 0.5627 BoP, current US$ per person Nicaragua
1980s 6.64 BoP, current US$ per person 18.99 BoP, current US$ per person 12.35 BoP, current US$ per person Nicaragua
1990s 10.96 BoP, current US$ per person 81.14 BoP, current US$ per person 70.18 BoP, current US$ per person Nicaragua
2000s 19.04 BoP, current US$ per person 118.07 BoP, current US$ per person 99.03 BoP, current US$ per person Nicaragua
2010s 17.48 BoP, current US$ per person 40.07 BoP, current US$ per person 22.59 BoP, current US$ per person Nicaragua
2020s 21.59 BoP, current US$ per person 23.42 BoP, current US$ per person 1.83 BoP, current US$ per person Nicaragua

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher grants, excluding technical cooperation (bop, current us$), per capita, Guatemala or Nicaragua?
Nicaragua, at 22.17 BoP, current US$ per person against 20.97 BoP, current US$ per person in Guatemala as of 2023.
What is the difference in grants, excluding technical cooperation (bop, current us$), per capita between Guatemala and Nicaragua?
1.2 BoP, current US$ per person, with Nicaragua ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Nicaragua?
64 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2023.
How do Guatemala and Nicaragua rank globally for grants, excluding technical cooperation (bop, current us$), per capita?
Guatemala ranks 115th and Nicaragua ranks 112th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Grants, excluding technical cooperation (BoP, current US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guatemala vs Nicaragua: Grants, excluding technical cooperation (BoP, current US$), per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/grants-excluding-technical-cooperation-bop-current-us-per-capita/guatemala/nicaragua/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/grants-excluding-technical-cooperation-bop-current-us-per-capita/guatemala/nicaragua/">Guatemala vs Nicaragua: Grants, excluding technical cooperation (BoP, current US$), per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Grants, excluding technical cooperation (BoP, current US$), per capita
Unit
BoP, current US$ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
182 places, 9,095 data points, 1960–2023
Last refreshed

Grants, excluding technical cooperation (BoP, current US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.