Bangladesh vs Equatorial Guinea: Grants, excluding technical cooperation (BoP, current US$), per capita

Bangladesh
8.44 BoP, current US$ per person
in 2023
Equatorial Guinea
6.88 BoP, current US$ per person
in 2023
Bangladesh rank
142nd
Equatorial Guinea rank
143rd

Grants, excluding technical cooperation (BoP, current US$), per capita over time

  • Bangladesh
  • Equatorial Guinea
020406080100197119972023

How they compare

Bangladesh currently reports 8.44 BoP, current US$ per person against 6.88 BoP, current US$ per person in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 1.56 BoP, current US$ per person.

That makes Bangladesh's figure about 1.2 times Equatorial Guinea's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 51 shared years of data; in 1973 it was Bangladesh ahead.

Bangladesh ranks 142nd and Equatorial Guinea ranks 143rd of 181 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Bangladesh averaged higher in 1 and Equatorial Guinea in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bangladesh Equatorial Guinea Difference Ahead
1970s 4.41 BoP, current US$ per person 8.08 BoP, current US$ per person 3.67 BoP, current US$ per person Equatorial Guinea
1980s 6.69 BoP, current US$ per person 28.5 BoP, current US$ per person 21.81 BoP, current US$ per person Equatorial Guinea
1990s 6.07 BoP, current US$ per person 32.03 BoP, current US$ per person 25.96 BoP, current US$ per person Equatorial Guinea
2000s 5.59 BoP, current US$ per person 22.58 BoP, current US$ per person 16.99 BoP, current US$ per person Equatorial Guinea
2010s 7.37 BoP, current US$ per person 13.15 BoP, current US$ per person 5.79 BoP, current US$ per person Equatorial Guinea
2020s 8.78 BoP, current US$ per person 7.35 BoP, current US$ per person 1.43 BoP, current US$ per person Bangladesh

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher grants, excluding technical cooperation (bop, current us$), per capita, Bangladesh or Equatorial Guinea?
Bangladesh, at 8.44 BoP, current US$ per person against 6.88 BoP, current US$ per person in Equatorial Guinea as of 2023.
What is the difference in grants, excluding technical cooperation (bop, current us$), per capita between Bangladesh and Equatorial Guinea?
1.56 BoP, current US$ per person, with Bangladesh ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Equatorial Guinea?
51 years are reported by both, from 1973 to 2023.
How do Bangladesh and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for grants, excluding technical cooperation (bop, current us$), per capita?
Bangladesh ranks 142nd and Equatorial Guinea ranks 143rd of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Grants, excluding technical cooperation (BoP, current US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bangladesh vs Equatorial Guinea: Grants, excluding technical cooperation (BoP, current US$), per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/grants-excluding-technical-cooperation-bop-current-us-per-capita/bangladesh/equatorial-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/grants-excluding-technical-cooperation-bop-current-us-per-capita/bangladesh/equatorial-guinea/">Bangladesh vs Equatorial Guinea: Grants, excluding technical cooperation (BoP, current US$), per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Grants, excluding technical cooperation (BoP, current US$), per capita
Unit
BoP, current US$ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
182 places, 9,095 data points, 1960–2023
Last refreshed

Grants, excluding technical cooperation (BoP, current US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.